Election 2024

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

How are Labour doing after their first 12 months


  • Total voters
    23
I can't see Putin doing any deals. As you've said, IF Crimea probably prefers being Russian anyway, he will see it as non negotiable, I know I would. I don't know the make up of Ukraine (for want of better wording) and whether there are other similar areas currently occupied by Russia that would feel the same. I just don't take the media narratives stance around all this, Ukranians may well want to be part of NATO and the EU, but I assume there will be some people within the boundaries of Ukraine that don't want that. It's a bit like asking an Englishman in Scotland if he wants independence, I'm not of the broadbrush approach thinking and often feel things are more complicated than this. Yeah Putin is a shhite and I'll repeat again he deserves a bullet to the head for the deaths he's caused, but in times of negotiation, I think Putin is going to want more than just Crimea. And while I think Putin is a shhite of the highest order, I don't particularly subscribed to the liking of Zelenssky either, just because our media chose to portray him as some kind of hero. Not suggesting for one moment my view is correct, I just question everything and question it again, it;s a bit like when you are a kid, the cowboys were the good guys and the indians the baddies, it's easy to get stereotyped into one version of events in life.

I think Putin will want the current occupied territory which in the grand scheme of things, considering what Russia originally wanted, would be a win for Ukraine.

They will essentially lose territory they haven't fully controlled for 10 years anyway.
 
I think Putin will want the current occupied territory which in the grand scheme of things, considering what Russia originally wanted, would be a win for Ukraine.

They will essentially lose territory they haven't fully controlled for 10 years anyway.

I think the people of Mauripol would disagree that it's a win for Ukraine, but I think the Donbas is going to end up as Russian territory.

Problem is, that region is never going to be settled now as there will always be Ukrainian / Russian factions who will lay claim to it.
 
I think the people of Mauripol would disagree that it's a win for Ukraine, but I think the Donbas is going to end up as Russian territory.

Problem is, that region is never going to be settled now as there will always be Ukrainian / Russian factions who will lay claim to it.

You ain't ever going to please everybody so, **** it, majority rules.

Donbas and Crimea are lost, they ain't coming back.

There ain't no kumbayaing out of this war I'm afraid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego and brb
You ain't ever going to please everybody so, **** it, majority rules.

Donbas and Crimea are lost, they ain't coming back.
Dunno if's a case of majority rule

But I agree Donbas and Crimea are going to be Russian Territory, especially when Trump withdraws $$$$bn from Ukraine.
 
Maybe, or maybe they'll end up as 'independent' states.

Mentioned this earlier, that they might become autonomous states a bit like the Basque region in Spain. So a Ukrainian cultural state within Russia

I dunno, there's not really a one size fits all with this.
 
Pension Mega Funds, what could possibly go wrong!

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/britain-eyes-pension-megafunds-super-charge-economy-2024-11-13/

Tom Frost, head of UK institutional clients at abrdn (ABDN.L), opens new tab, said the public was largely in favour of using pension savings to power UK businesses, housing and infrastructure but over-consolidation would usher in different risks.
"If the number of schemes is reduced to too low a number, this could limit innovation and lead to decreased competition, thereby resulting in poorer outcomes for current and future pensioners," he said.

Australia and Canada have pension megafunds, so what's the risks...

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/busines...tralia-mega-pensions-pose-risks-to-stability/
 
  • Like
Reactions: duggie2000
Pension Mega Funds, what could possibly go wrong!

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/britain-eyes-pension-megafunds-super-charge-economy-2024-11-13/

Tom Frost, head of UK institutional clients at abrdn (ABDN.L), opens new tab, said the public was largely in favour of using pension savings to power UK businesses, housing and infrastructure but over-consolidation would usher in different risks.
"If the number of schemes is reduced to too low a number, this could limit innovation and lead to decreased competition, thereby resulting in poorer outcomes for current and future pensioners," he said.

Australia and Canada have pension megafunds, so what's the risks...

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/busines...tralia-mega-pensions-pose-risks-to-stability/

Makes no odds because our Rachael is planning a tax raid on pension funds on the scale of Gordon Browns £5b a year during Labours 13 yrs of pillage
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
Watched a bit of PMQs, Kemi is a big downgrade on Sunak. She looked genuinely flustered at times and accidently blamed a Tory policy on Labour.

Farage asked one question that wasn't really all that interesting, I think he wanted to "appear"
 
Watched a bit of PMQs, Kemi is a big downgrade on Sunak. She looked genuinely flustered at times and accidently blamed a Tory policy on Labour.

Farage asked one question that wasn't really all that interesting, I think he wanted to "appear"


And Starmer welcomed him back to the U.K., saying “He’s spent so much time in America, I expected to see him on the immigration statistics” <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: remembercolinlee