This is the bit i don't get as the most prominent group attempting to get the law changed were people with MND who often would not be able to actually physically do it hence there attempts to get the law changed .
Yup, I think these people just want some law passed to legalise end of life, that will not help them in their situations, but once it's passed people will set about other legal challenges, such as if X why not Y. They are more or less themselves and it's supporters saying it will not change anything, other than make it legal, so the case is looked at by a court before death, rather than how it is at the moment after death from a coroners/law perspective. Just feels like to me lets get the bill passed and we deal with the next problem later, thus the examples then come in from other countries, where it is legalised, and they start including other aspects over time - where do we go then, do we look at people that will not die but have a poor quality of life maybe due to mental health and attempted suicides. It's opening a pandora's box and my view is keep the lid on it, let alone crossing religious boundaries. Also feels like they are trying to rush this through, because they know damn well there will be strong objections, but I get that's just subjective on my part.

