It won't be his loss no matter what if he's really got options. He could be on the last dregs of desperation and using us to try keep his name out there. Or he could have atletico ready and looking for his big pay day
so we do need a midfielder, given the work they get through and number of games. Sounds like he’s priced himself out of the market right now but, like everything else, it’s about supply and demand. No demand, no contract. One or two injuries and demand increases……he’s smart and patient and very soon, will be in the driving seat. all that said. Not for me thanks
Keep swallowing the main stream media narrative .Stop being lazy and do your own research,you will be shocked.
Yeah sure. I translate thst as go listen to some right wing extremists spout conspiracy theories I'd like to see where the actual "research" can be d9ne to prove tommy robinson (hilariously fake) is not a white supremist and total racist
Liverpool interested in Jamal Musiala. https://www.teamtalk.com/liverpool/...ern-star-sideline-one-of-klopps-last-signings
Out of interest, where did you learn what you know about Tommy Robinson? And where do you start your research on anyone you want to find out about?
Thanks for that but the question was for mito? I'd like to know how he researches. Seeing as you replied, a question for you, what do his court records say?
You've jumped into a conversation I wanted to have with mito. I'm not interested in Tommy Robinson, I'm interested in where mito gets his information.
He's been at it for years mate. On the news. I don't need to go follwojg that cesspit on social media. BNP Defence league (ss wannabes) Usual football hooligan background Been locked up 4 times Including assaults and for travelling on false papers Has several aliases Probably only skins the tip of that particular cesspit in terms of the criminality, tax evasion and hate crimes. Basically the sort that would be front and centre when the new ss needs officers to start organising the lynch mobs. He's so nasty yet educated that he willfully ignored the fact he would have been target 1 or 2in the 70s and 80s with his background and has pivoted from anti semitisem to anti-islam to get his kicks. In reality he'd be considered a white supremist who'd cleanse everyone not of his liking. The news does exist for a reason. I don't need social media to tell me this guys lies or his supporters lies to see what they are about.
My issue was that when someone has a different opinion to you, as happened earlier, you accuse them of getting their facts and/or opinions from far right social media accounts. You could engage in a discussion and ask why they think what they think, have a back and forth and maybe learn something you didn't know but you go straight in with baseless accusations. Instead of accusing you of getting your information from far left media, I asked where you got it from because that's what open minded people do, seek facts to try and gain understanding. What specific sources do you use? Do you do what you accuse others of and only believe those that affirm what you have decided is the only way to look at something? The BBC, for example, has just been found to have breached its own editorial guidelines 1,500 times over its reporting of the current Israel situation. People getting their information from them have been misled. They have reported fake news in some instances and people have believed and repeated it.
