Summer '24 transfer window

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
That's probably the worst piece of football journalism i've seen. Using 'done deal?' as clickbait for an opinion piece is crazy.

It's madness. It's just some random bloke mentioning his name and saying he isn't good enough and needs to step up if he does sign! <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: SourPatch2
The only question I would ask of our billionaire owners would be - could they not float a few transfers fees from their own pocket? Like a bridging loan, until we received a fee for Clarke? I mean, we all knew he was going and actually selling him on Deadline Day (when we already have spent what we need to spend) might just have inflated the fee a bit.

I get the sustainability thing, but occasionally a bit of speculation can help, especially when you aren't then trying to buy players when every club knows you have £20m to spend.

Just a thought.
Did we 'know' he was going? If we spend the money in advance of him leaving it just means that we're left under pressure to accept whatever offer we get.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Culinary
Did we 'know' he was going? If we spend the money in advance of him leaving it just means that we're left under pressure to accept whatever offer we get.
Well. He went. That is evidence enough surely?
Clubs and agents will have had conversations. The club knew he was going. We all knew he was going, it was about the right sum at the right time. The club said they accepted the bid when they did to avoid a bidding war on Deadline Day that might have hampered their own business. My point was that maybe the club could have done it's business earlier through director loans then settled that with the Clarke money.

In any case, it's just a threory.
 
Well. He went. That is evidence enough surely?
Clubs and agents will have had conversations. The club knew he was going. We all knew he was going, it was about the right sum at the right time. The club said they accepted the bid when they did to avoid a bidding war on Deadline Day that might have hampered their own business. My point was that maybe the club could have done it's business earlier through director loans then settled that with the Clarke money.

In any case, it's just a threory.
No I know. We're all guessing about what may have happened. For me personally, I don't ever want us doing the 'speculate to accumulate' thing over individual transfers. We're already a subsidised club, to the tune of many millions a year. The consequence of a miscalculation are too risky. Additionally, as soon as we deviate from a way of working, we've justified deviating permanently IMO.
 
No I know. We're all guessing about what may have happened. For me personally, I don't ever want us doing the 'speculate to accumulate' thing over individual transfers. We're already a subsidised club, to the tune of many millions a year. The consequence of a miscalculation are too risky. Additionally, as soon as we deviate from a way of working, we've justified deviating permanently IMO.
Fair enough
 
Stupid silly rumours have started -

You must log in or register to see media

Click bait journalism from Frank McAvennie. Christ, I didn't think journalism could get much but taking the ramblings of that drunken, drug dealing bankrupt and publishing them? The drunks in Mowbray park are probably more clued up than that halfwit
 
  • Like
Reactions: TopCat.
The only question I would ask of our billionaire owners would be - could they not float a few transfers fees from their own pocket? Like a bridging loan, until we received a fee for Clarke? I mean, we all knew he was going and actually selling him on Deadline Day (when we already have spent what we need to spend) might just have inflated the fee a bit.

I get the sustainability thing, but occasionally a bit of speculation can help, especially when you aren't then trying to buy players when every club knows you have £20m to spend.

Just a thought.
I think they are limited in what they can actually spend though, if we didn't then sell clarke n they had already spent the money then we could be in trouble

They are doing things the right way, hate seeing clubs doing what Birmingham doing - spending big wages n fees on average players
 
It sounds to me that money is available for the right players regardless of sales. If the reported figure of 11m Euro for Bamba is anywhere near the mark.
Personally I would have liked a striker through the door but in all honesty from the little I have seen of Isidor we may have a gem on our hands.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Montysoptician