Transfer Rumours Summer 2024 transfer thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Why you skeptical

Because it made no commercial sense for Villa. From what Tan said they could match at 15m but if someone came in above that we could sell to someone else. Which makes the 15m offer for Villa pretty redundant, it just helps us set the bidding at a minimum.
 
They’re reporting in Birmingham, that if we agree to sell him, we have to give Villa the option of matching the fee agreed.

Well that would be the case for almost every transfer anyway. If you’ve agreed a price for a player you’re going to accept that price from basically any other interested parties too, maybe with the exception of key rivals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stockholm Tiger
Because it made no commercial sense for Villa. From what Tan said they could match at 15m but if someone came in above that we could sell to someone else. Which makes the 15m offer for Villa pretty redundant, it just helps us set the bidding at a minimum.

Pretty sure he did say that villa would have the chance to match any fee another club agreed over and above 15m. But he also said the 15m buyback would only trigger if the 2 clubs were in the same division.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stockholm Tiger
Well that would be the case for almost every transfer anyway. If you’ve agreed a price for a player you’re going to accept that price from basically any other interested parties too, maybe with the exception of key rivals.

Presumably though in this case if Villa match the fee they get first right to agree personal terms. However everything I've heard is that Villa don't want him back.
 
They’re reporting in Birmingham, that if we agree to sell him, we have to give Villa the option of matching the fee agreed.
Which presumably (unless we have terrible lawyers) would mean 23m Euros plus whatever the loan fee is for next season. Sounds like at least £20m if not more. Can't see Villa paying that for a player they didn't rate enough to keep a season ago.
 
Presumably though in this case if Villa match the fee they get first right to agree personal terms. However everything I've heard is that Villa don't want him back.

I think all this kind of stuff is just a load of bollocks, there’s no way anything like that could be policed. How would anyone stop Barca getting in contact with him or his representatives and how would it be proved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SydneyTiger14
I think all this kind of stuff is just a load of bollocks, there’s no way anything like that could be policed. How would anyone stop Barca getting in contact with him or his representatives and how would it be proved.

It'd be proved if he went to Barca before Villa got a chance to speak to him and they'd kick up a fuss. As a general principle though I agree all this stuff is so convoluted and gets twisted in knots.
 
Barca have bad current history of paying for players. Leeds haven’t received the full fee for Raphinha yet

I don’t know why those ****s haven’t been given a transfer ban until they pay any outstanding instalments for players they’ve signed. People can complain about Man City all they want but I think Barça’s actions have been far more egregious and they’ve been allowed to get away with it.