What’s PJ style of play, the last few months have scarred me
Either way, let’s hope we back him in the market with what we need
Amen to that mate.
What’s PJ style of play, the last few months have scarred me
Either way, let’s hope we back him in the market with what we need
So you are allowed to post posts containing guesswork but others aren't? Got it.

My part? It wasn't me who said it.Posting guesswork as an opinion is one thing ...
... posting guesswork as fact is another.
You're stating why Mowbray was sacked when it's just speculation on your part.
"He was stating facts, he was sacked to cover up for Speakmans incompetence
You seem to want an argument over semantics, not football, sorry not interested.
Would be a massive shock to me that one mate. You have to interview in person at least once for a role like this I think.Curiously a lad over the road came up with a very specific theory without actually tagging it as a theory until he was picked up on it. Said it was a Haunch.
anyway he thinks the interviews and agreement will have been done by Zoom and that we will probably hear today so you never know he might actually be ITK but pretending not to be !
this isn’t negatGod, everything has to be so negative about the club doesn’t it?
Would be a massive shock to me that one mate. You have to interview in person at least once for a role like this I think.
Who's editing my posts? And why?

There is definietely gaps in the continuity and that wraps around playing style, in my opinion anyway. The first appointment was Johnson who was regarded as an attacking front foot coach. Then we jumped to Neil who is considered much more pragmatic. To Mowbray who again wants to play attractive expansive football. Those three each, in their own way, moved us forward a large step. Then we land on Beale, again very different. Then we appear focussed on Still.I'd argue the fact that Still and Jansen being so different in terms of style and approach would suggest either no or poor succession planning, same when Beale was the appointment after Mowbray. The so called continuity is just not there.
I’ve got a breeze of Pascal.Have you got wind of something?
With Jansen or Rosenior I think we'll get it right. I'm very excited about the prospect of both.There is definietely gaps in the continuity and that wraps around playing style, in my opinion anyway. The first appointment was Johnson who was regarded as an attacking front foot coach. Then we jumped to Neil who is considered much more pragmatic. To Mowbray who again wants to play attractive expansive football. Those three each, in their own way, moved us forward a large step. Then we land on Beale, again very different. Then we appear focussed on Still.
None of it seems to make sense in terms of how we have built the squad. I still maintain we have built a 433 squad, with lots of technical ability. They will shine under a high possession style. But we go for Still who is not that sort of coach, at least on evidence so far. It does seem like the club do loads of things right and well, but have yet to link them together at first team level to make everything work in tandem.
There is definietely gaps in the continuity and that wraps around playing style, in my opinion anyway. The first appointment was Johnson who was regarded as an attacking front foot coach. Then we jumped to Neil who is considered much more pragmatic. To Mowbray who again wants to play attractive expansive football. Those three each, in their own way, moved us forward a large step. Then we land on Beale, again very different. Then we appear focussed on Still.
None of it seems to make sense in terms of how we have built the squad. I still maintain we have built a 433 squad, with lots of technical ability. They will shine under a high possession style. But we go for Still who is not that sort of coach, at least on evidence so far. It does seem like the club do loads of things right and well, but have yet to link them together at first team level to make everything work in tandem.
I’ve got a breeze of Pascal.
Common practice to interview first on zoom and then decide if it’s worth bringing to site for further talks. Gives us and candidate a chance to both understand what the others about before taking to next stage. Simply good practice especially when you’re potentially flying someone in from say Saudi or South America.Zoom would be stranger for a candidate than the club, I think and am therefore stating as fact
As a prospective manager you'd want a look around and get a feeling for the place.
Jansen and Rosenior excite me. Prefer Jansen as I think he might just be the guy to get the likes of Rigg at the top of their game. Also hope he can get under the skin of some of our individuals and get them flying again.With Jansen or Rosenior I think we'll get it right. I'm very excited about the prospect of both.
I think it was you who suggested we always seem to need to fail with our first choice coach to then land the better coach, Keane when we appointed Neil and Still now![]()
Bit of a frosty start to this fine Sunday gents

Just a guess or you genuinely heard something?I’ve got a breeze of Pascal.
Aye, 100%. Could do 1st round on it to make sure it is worth the trip. But as a coach you need to see the academy and training setup, then quiz the DoF and possibly existing coaching staff. I do think a head coach often chooses the club as much as the club chooses them, at the higher end anyway.Zoom would be stranger for a candidate than the club, I think and am therefore stating as fact
As a prospective manager you'd want a look around and get a feeling for the place.