Owners generally speaking dont know enough to make informed judgements about coaches etc. It is why they have advisors, in a lot of cases anyway. I dont know much about the Hull owner but I know a few Hull fans who think it is a mind boggling decision. Rosenior seemed to be building something at Hull, and arguably he fell just short, but in a league with those 3 relegated teams and Ipswich is that so bad? Coaches these days dont get time. Lets see who they bring in next, but I wouldnt be surprised to see Rosenior get another crack at the championship.I wonder how wedded he is to that style of play, he took over when they were in danger of relegation and it would have been foolish to attempt an expansive style of play, could be that he went with a pragmatic approach initially and intended to gradually move away from it. Got sacked for it but maybe the owner's a chump who doesn't know what's best.
If he took over at Arsenal (hypothetically) would he want them playing dull but effective football or would he be intelligent enough to recognise it doesn't suit them and adapt?
I'm also looking at him in comparison with Still and the other bloke whose name escapes me. People seem keen on them but it's based on very little. With Rosenior you've got a coach that you can be as confident as you can be that if you give him a decent team in the championship he'll have them in or around the playoffs.
