Sorry I wrote that wrong, I meant before he won anything. Feel free to bite nowPedantic… you know exactly what I mean, but I’ll not bite, can’t be arsed

Sorry I wrote that wrong, I meant before he won anything. Feel free to bite nowPedantic… you know exactly what I mean, but I’ll not bite, can’t be arsed

I agree with this. Don't think dodds would be the right man.Ill be shocked if dodds is the permanent manager, not done enough to deserve the job
Im pretty confident itll be someone who is in a role at the minute
The Prem -These days it would be a teenager with a laptop, a mixing desk and samples from artists they'll never be as good as ....
You must log in or register to see media
Hope you are right on both although I'd probably have some doleys but notIll be shocked if dodds is the permanent manager, not done enough to deserve the job
Im pretty confident itll be someone who is in a role at the minute
To be fair, he said that if we went for Dodds or Heckingbottom it would show we were going for the cheap option. I tend to think it would be the easy option.I don't think your original point holds much water TBF... Sometimes a "cheap" option can be the best. How much do you think Potter cost Swansea from Ostersund? What about when Brighton picked up the unemployed De Zerbi?
Not saying either Heckingbottom or Dodds are the right option, I'm just saying the logic of "if they're cheap it means the club aren't serious" is wrong. They may simply have identified a candidate they believe in who isn't necessarily the most expensive option
same would not be impressed at all and it would prove without a doubt that we always do cheap option and have no ambition at allI wouldnt be impressed at all if it were Dodds. Even if he won these next 3 games. He is a couple of years, at least, away from a head coach gig at a club targeting promotion to the premier league. Last 2 games have been good, but lets not forget the rest of them, a lot of which were awful. To date he has got us 12 points from his 12 games in charge this season. Beale managed 14 from 11 games, so lets not start imagining he is up to the job.
We wont appoint him, im confident they have a clear no1 target in mind and want to get him. If dodds was the one they wanted they'd of appointed himI wouldnt be impressed at all if it were Dodds. Even if he won these next 3 games. He is a couple of years, at least, away from a head coach gig at a club targeting promotion to the premier league. Last 2 games have been good, but lets not forget the rest of them, a lot of which were awful. To date he has got us 12 points from his 12 games in charge this season. Beale managed 14 from 11 games, so lets not start imagining he is up to the job.
I 100% agree. I think they probably do have a target, and maybe a very shortlist by now. I hope so anyway. My nagging doubt is their track record when it comes to appointments. Johnson served his purpose I think. They seemed to opt for Neil then get seduced by Keane, before finally getting him. Mowbray was good, but I wonder how much that was an appointment made out of convenience than planning. I dont think Beale was anywhere near their thinking when sacking Mowbray. It feels a weak spot to me so far, the process they go through. I might be being harsh. This one has to be right, no room for errors. Whoever they get has to be the man for the next 2 years and achieve this 5 year plan. I wonder if they have made use of an agent, or consultancy, to help them this time. We arent exactly full of know how in this space. I would like to think part of this process has been some third party input and guidance. Lets see.We wont appoint him, im confident they have a clear no1 target in mind and want to get him. If dodds was the one they wanted they'd of appointed him
They wont be influenced by a couple good results when the majority have been poor - in my opinion
I get that but theyve been spot on 75% of the time so im trusting theyll get this rightI 100% agree. I think they probably do have a target, and maybe a very shortlist by now. I hope so anyway. My nagging doubt is their track record when it comes to appointments. Johnson served his purpose I think. They seemed to opt for Neil then get seduced by Keane, before finally getting him. Mowbray was good, but I wonder how much that was an appointment made out of convenience than planning. I dont think Beale was anywhere near their thinking when sacking Mowbray. It feels a weak spot to me so far, the process they go through. I might be being harsh. This one has to be right, no room for errors. Whoever they get has to be the man for the next 2 years and achieve this 5 year plan. I wonder if they have made use of an agent, or consultancy, to help them this time. We arent exactly full of know how in this space. I would like to think part of this process has been some third party input and guidance. Lets see.
Still is their no1 target, got a feeling he will be the next appointment, there's been a mention of compensation, the club will know what that is in the summer. That's the reason they didn't get him before Beale.We wont appoint him, im confident they have a clear no1 target in mind and want to get him. If dodds was the one they wanted they'd of appointed him
They wont be influenced by a couple good results when the majority have been poor - in my opinion
Personally don't think we were ever after him, think kld/speakman want still. Seen what the poster otr said and he doesn't seem to be a poster that posts ****e but we will see one way or anotherSomeone over the road reckons he’s heard from the Heckingbottom himself that he is not who we are after. Make of that what you will.
Someone over the road reckons he’s heard from the Heckingbottom himself that he is not who we are after. Make of that what you will.
StillMy guess is that he'd come if we wanted him with our without his staff. He won't get a job in the PL and wouldn't want to go to L1. He isn't capable of going abroad so he's looking at about a dozen Championship clubs at most.
He's a mini-Mowbray imo and not an exciting prospect ...
... I don't think we ever considered him.
We certainly have him some thought after Mowbray as he came up here for talks. How serious those talks were, I have no idea.My guess is that he'd come if we wanted him with or without his staff. He won't get a job in the PL and wouldn't want to go to L1. He isn't capable of going abroad so he's looking at about a dozen Championship clubs at most.
He's a mini-Mowbray imo and not an exciting prospect ...
... I don't think we ever considered him.
one was stillI heard Speakman went to Europe for manager talks a few weeks back. Which would rule out someone like Rohl. And if it is taking so long surely it's a manager in a job. It all points to Still or some outside shout.