Off Topic Russell Brand

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I haven’t read all the posts and a little late to the party on this one. When he was in his prime around 2007, 2008 or 2009 he stayed in what used to be the Gosforth park Marriott he had loads on females in his room left it a mess with used condoms and different drugs all over room. He was a disgrace, like people have said surprised it has taken so long to come out. He was probably so high on drugs he most probably can’t remember and if he can he probably thinks he did nothing wrong.

You must be equally baffled about how the surviving members of the Beatles, Led Zep and all the other notorious hotel trashing and womanising bands from the 60s onwards are still yet to be cancelled and put through the court of public opinion then.

https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/led-zeppelin-destruction-of-the-edgewater-hotel/
 
I also see that YouTube have demonetized him. Based on allegations, not charges, not convictions.

Concerning, whichever opinion of him you have. Don't agree with a Youtuber's opinion? Make an allegation. Doesn't matter if it's true or not, you're completely anonymous after all. Problem solved.

Another thing conspiracy theorists will grab onto with both hands.
 
Why didn’t these bitches go to the cops at the time?
Quite happy to be shagged by the bloke at the time no doubt!!
Now looking for any compo that can get.
Any police involvement yet?
Thought so!!!

Bart
This has to be one of the stupidest, most insensitive, mind-numbingly dumb statements put on the internet. Ever. Well done.
 
This has to be one of the stupidest, most insensitive, mind-numbingly dumb statements put on the internet. Ever. Well done.

Apparently Brand is innocent unless proven guilty.

The women are guilty without a trial.

Someone has serious issues with women ...

... so does Brand, two peas in a pod.
 
Apparently Brand is innocent unless proven guilty.

The women are guilty without a trial.

Someone has serious issues with women ...

... so does Brand, two peas in a pod.
I'd like to know his opinion on the woman allegedly raped by Brand in LA years ago who immediately reported it to the authorities, told friends, went to the Rape Crisis centre, was medically examined for confirmation of the sexual activity and underwent years of counselling as a result. Gold digging bitch?
 
I'd like to know his opinion on the woman allegedly raped by Brand in LA years ago who immediately reported it to the authorities, told friends, went to the Rape Crisis centre, was medically examined for confirmation of the sexual activity and underwent years of counselling as a result. Gold digging bitch?

That's an interesting one. Decided not to press charges according to the LA Police Department.

The question is why. The 'scared to report it' reasoning, which can legitimately be applied to other potential victims, doesn't hold here, because she did report it.

I'm still baffled as to how this level of misbehaviour didn't come out during Me Too when people were being accused of far less left right and centre. He must have been the easiest of easy targets.
 
But not necessarily what they actually mean

Every time I see a new clip of him I'm reminded of this comment. The first interview I saw, he described the accusations as "baroque"... which makes literally zero sense in the context - it means "relating to or denoting a style of European architecture, music, and art of the 17th and 18th centuries" <doh>

Just seen another clip where he claims his transparency has been "metastasized" into something criminal. I think he is using the word in place of "transformed" but... That's not what it means. It essentially means "spread", but referring specifically to cancer cells. The cancer bit I suppose he could argue is a metaphor (although even that doesn't really work), but the underlying meaning of "spread" instead of "transformed" means the word is completely out of place, even allowing for the wonky metaphor.

In short, the bloke just likes to use big words to make himself sound intelligent / superior. You'd think if he was planning on using them in a public address he would at least have a quick glance at the disctionary first, though <doh>
 
Every time I see a new clip of him I'm reminded of this comment. The first interview I saw, he described the accusations as "baroque"... which makes literally zero sense in the context - it means "relating to or denoting a style of European architecture, music, and art of the 17th and 18th centuries" <doh>

Just seen another clip where he claims his transparency has been "metastasized" into something criminal. I think he is using the word in place of "transformed" but... That's not what it means. It essentially means "spread", but referring specifically to cancer cells. The cancer bit I suppose he could argue is a metaphor (although even that doesn't really work), but the underlying meaning of "spread" instead of "transformed" means the word is completely out of place, even allowing for the wonky metaphor.

In short, the bloke just likes to use big words to make himself sound intelligent / superior. You'd think if he was planning on using them in a public address he would at least have a quick glance at the disctionary first, though <doh>

Using the word baroque was truly idiotic wasn't it.

There's no possible way to make it work in any way ...

... except it rhymes with cock which is basically what he is.
 
Every time I see a new clip of him I'm reminded of this comment. The first interview I saw, he described the accusations as "baroque"... which makes literally zero sense in the context - it means "relating to or denoting a style of European architecture, music, and art of the 17th and 18th centuries" <doh>

Just seen another clip where he claims his transparency has been "metastasized" into something criminal. I think he is using the word in place of "transformed" but... That's not what it means. It essentially means "spread", but referring specifically to cancer cells. The cancer bit I suppose he could argue is a metaphor (although even that doesn't really work), but the underlying meaning of "spread" instead of "transformed" means the word is completely out of place, even allowing for the wonky metaphor.

In short, the bloke just likes to use big words to make himself sound intelligent / superior. You'd think if he was planning on using them in a public address he would at least have a quick glance at the disctionary first, though <doh>

'Egregious' is always the red flag for me - the sure sign of dickheadery.
 
Every time I see a new clip of him I'm reminded of this comment. The first interview I saw, he described the accusations as "baroque"... which makes literally zero sense in the context - it means "relating to or denoting a style of European architecture, music, and art of the 17th and 18th centuries" <doh>

Just seen another clip where he claims his transparency has been "metastasized" into something criminal. I think he is using the word in place of "transformed" but... That's not what it means. It essentially means "spread", but referring specifically to cancer cells. The cancer bit I suppose he could argue is a metaphor (although even that doesn't really work), but the underlying meaning of "spread" instead of "transformed" means the word is completely out of place, even allowing for the wonky metaphor.

In short, the bloke just likes to use big words to make himself sound intelligent / superior. You'd think if he was planning on using them in a public address he would at least have a quick glance at the disctionary first, though <doh>
The word baroque, as I understand it, was initially a negative one. For some time it was used to describe contorted ideas e.g. In art terms Baroque for some time had some challenging perceptions but subsequent to the period has been reframed somewhat. I have no idea how Brand used it, and I doubt he is half as clever as he thinks he is. One of the least likeable people to have been on my tv I would say, but maybe he is random enough to make some weird connection with this word and think he is being clever. I agree with you, it is entirely out of context and idiotic, very much like Brand himself.
 
The bloke comes across as someone I would quite probably want to smack if I ever met him in real life. If I was stuck in a room for 72 hours with just him, one of us isn't coming out alive. Throw in a gun, and not sure if I'm blowing his brains out or my own

But

Innocent until proven guilty needs to be upheld

Anonymous until proven guilty needs to be implemented
 
Every time I see a new clip of him I'm reminded of this comment. The first interview I saw, he described the accusations as "baroque"... which makes literally zero sense in the context - it means "relating to or denoting a style of European architecture, music, and art of the 17th and 18th centuries" <doh>

Just seen another clip where he claims his transparency has been "metastasized" into something criminal. I think he is using the word in place of "transformed" but... That's not what it means. It essentially means "spread", but referring specifically to cancer cells. The cancer bit I suppose he could argue is a metaphor (although even that doesn't really work), but the underlying meaning of "spread" instead of "transformed" means the word is completely out of place, even allowing for the wonky metaphor.

In short, the bloke just likes to use big words to make himself sound intelligent / superior. You'd think if he was planning on using them in a public address he would at least have a quick glance at the disctionary first, though <doh>
This Cockney slime ball using big words is like Dell Boy trying to speak french.
 
Using the word baroque was truly idiotic wasn't it.

There's no possible way to make it work in any way ...

... except it rhymes with cock which is basically what he is.

He's a man who is not as clever as he thinks he is. He has uttered this type of drivel before.

A few years ago, and approaching an election, he declared he was getting involved to, "enervate the campaign". He meant energise, enervate of course meaning the opposite. But he'd heard an unusual word and though he could impress by hoying it in.

Absolute talent vacuum of a human.
 
He's a man who is not as clever as he thinks he is. He has uttered this type of drivel before.

A few years ago, and approaching an election, he declared he was getting involved to, "enervate the campaign". He meant energise, enervate of course meaning the opposite. But he'd heard an unusual word and though he could impress by hoying it in.

Absolute talent vacuum of a human.

Appearing to be eloquent, and to be the new Oscar Wylde, can easily fool the gullible ...

... Boris Johnson has made an entire career of it.
 
Go easy, I know Boris.....A very, very clever bloke.

Not sure why he's even mentioned tbh.

Some people are so ideologically captured they have to wedge their sixth form politics student hot takes into every conversation, I suppose.