SAFC wont santion Batth to leave, key member of the first team.
Conversations upped a notch regarding Pritchard and Stoke.
Conversations upped a notch regarding Pritchard and Stoke.
Not surprised re that, they need to get a move on with transfers and Neil + Pritchard do seem to get on well.SAFC wont santion Batth to leave, key member of the first team.
Conversations upped a notch regarding Pritchard and Stoke.
Why would we sell anyone to that slimy twat?Not surprised re that, they need to get a move on with transfers and Neil + Pritchard do seem to get on well.
Player may want to leave? It’s not worth having an unhappy player in the squad if he wants to leave and someone is in for him - especially one who will likely be one of the higher earners in the squad.Why would we sell anyone to that slimy twat?
SAFC wont santion Batth to leave, key member of the first team.
Conversations upped a notch regarding Pritchard and Stoke.
I dont know that side of the conversation, but SAFC see Batth as a key asset in the first with experience and we need to compete. With Ballard subject of interest with a high valuation..Batth is key player.Do you reckon there's anything in the idea that Batth wants to leave for personal/family reasons?
I dont know that side of the conversation, but SAFC see Batth as a key asset in the first with experience and we need to compete. With Ballard subject of interest with a high valuation..Batth is key player.
Because they can’t finish a 90 minute game and they’re past their bestWhy would we sell anyone to that slimy twat?
He’s a class person to have as a leader - better than Evans in my view. If it’s true he has some family stuff going on that makes it a tough choice thoughI dont know that side of the conversation, but SAFC see Batth as a key asset in the first with experience and we need to compete. With Ballard subject of interest with a high valuation..Batth is key player.
Does it?He’s a class person to have as a leader - better than Evans in my view. If it’s true he has some family stuff going on that makes it a tough choice though
Batth and Ballard are key playersI dont know that side of the conversation, but SAFC see Batth as a key asset in the first with experience and we need to compete. With Ballard subject of interest with a high valuation..Batth is key player.
I’d say the fact he’s a top bloke would mean we’d want to be respectful. You wouldn’t I presumeDoes it?
He’s under contract
And Burnley offer 9 for Clarke, ffs if simms is worth 10 Clarke has to be worth 20 I knowBad value that. Let them crack on
Yes he is but who's going to benefit from keeping a player that's not happy, at the end of the day family comes first and if moving is what he needs to do then that's what he needs to doDoes it?
He’s under contract
It’s for the club and player to respect each other. I would hope player speaks to club, club acknowledges and if appropriate makes agreement to let player move on when a suitable replacement can be found. That may be this window or it may be January. Replacement arrives and player moves on.I’d say the fact he’s a top bloke would mean we’d want to be respectful. You wouldn’t I presume
You must log in or register to see media
£10m. Shocking.
NopeI’d say the fact he’s a top bloke would mean we’d want to be respectful. You wouldn’t I presume
The mistake we made is we couldnt replace him, i would trust our recruitment team to replace baath if he does leaveNope
We made that mistake with Kaboul