If you put Romero next to a Ledders-like CB, basically somebody who can read the game so doesn't need to commit, they would compliment each other perfectly
The issue is that, by playing as the RCB in Conte's system, that was placing him in situations where he would need to commit by design - and that happened more and more when our midfield lost control of games once Bentancur went down with injury and was exacerbated by Porro routinely being miles up the pitch (which does beg the question why Conte never seemed to consider Romero as a libero CCB and Dier in the Skriniar/Cahill role of his system, as on paper that always seemed like such a no-brainer)
This is also why I am hoping the links with Roger Ibanez are based more on speculation than anything else, as Ibanez is both a walking yellow card and also plays pretty much as Romero does but at LCB
My next madcap idea is sign both the Bundesliga boys and play Romero as an inverted RB. It just makes sense.
More broadly I do think the general willingness of Conte to forego any attempt to dominate possession, and the lack of depth in our midfield at the start of this year because of injuries, definitely exposed the CB unit to more than we’d have wanted. If we can get playing on the front foot then everyone, yes, even Eric Dier, will look better, though there’s still a chance he’ll be exposed by a high line.
I wouldn’t be surprised if we kept Dier though, he’s probably the one who we’d have the least interest in. I suspect Sanchez and Tanganga will have more potential buyers. And if we get Tapsoba and another LCB (VdV or Lenglet) then Dier is effectively 3rd choice RCB. So I’m not that fussed.
