Match Day Thread Official stadium name change; Sports Direct Arena

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
What worries me, is that if they can't find a stadium sponsor in the window that Derek is talking about, then they won't revert back to SJP and keep it as SDA.
 
There is nothing we can do that would cause Ashley to not change the name, therefore there is no point trying. Unless he was to unexpectedly die in the foreseeable future.

Ashley will not own the club for ever.

I fully agree that there is nothing that will cause Ashley to change the name in the short term. He may be stubborn enough not to change it while he owns the club. A day will come when he won't own the club.
 
@ SJP just didn't pull by the looks of it. There can't have been one single email inquiry about acquiring that one.

This is a marketing mistake, there will be fan outrage, how much doesn't really matter. The point is no company will want to be the target of the fans hatred for buying the naming rights. This isn't going to work. No ones going to 15 mio on the table to be the butt of jokes and being mentioned negatively in the press.

The way to do this is to do a cgi of a stadium fly-by and approach companies to show them what logos on the stadium could look like, actually doing it, and getting hounded for it is not good for business.
 
My fear (or one of them) is that potential sponsors will be put off by the fact that no matter what they try to call the stadium everyone will still refer to it as SJP.
That and who in their right mind would want to go into partnership with Ashley & Sports Direct?
 
Anyone seen this

“The introduction of a new UEFA licensing requirement from season 2012/13 for all clubs to have
an operating supporter liaison officer (SLO) marks an important new chapter in club-supporter
relations and emphasises how important this relationship is considered.
Under Article 35 of the new UEFA Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Regulations, clubs will
have the obligation to appoint an SLO to ensure a proper and constructive dialogue between a
club and its fans. The move is the result of close cooperation between European football's
governing body and Supporters Direct – the body that provides guidance and backing to fan
groups in 17 countries throughout Europe.
Supporter liaison officers at clubs already exist in a limited number of European countries and
primarily help improve the dialogue between the fans and the clubs they follow. Most importantly,
SLOs must be credible with supporters, and therefore should have experience with, and contacts
to, the networks in the club's fan base.”
 
For the good of your season, and your long term prospects I suggest you do nothing at all.

The way I see it is that Mike Ashley can do whatever he wants to his football club because he owns it. If he does something detrimental to the club then you should kick up a fuss, like some of our lot do with the our owners. If he installs new initiatives to bring financial investment into the club (not his own pocket) then you have to back him, because the more money that can be brought into your club, the better.

Why care so much about a name, especially if you're going to continue to call it St James' Park? If it was just you guys I'd feel sorry for you but it's not, loads of teams are doing it now so I think you should let this happen without a fuss because your players obviously thrive off your support.

I'd quite happily have Old Trafford renamed to The United States Stadium if it meant more money coming in. It's not like they're renaming your stadium The Mackem Stadium is it so forget it and move on, especially because there's absolutely nothing you can do about it.

But that's what people are skeptical about, they don't believe that any money will come in from sponsors. Find it hard to believe that he's putting any money in now and many don't think he has any intentions of selling the naming rights. Him and Dekka have lied to the supporters on too many occasions.

I do think you're right though in that during the match we need to get behind the team as one of the club's strong points is that everyone has been pulling in the right directon up til now. Ashley just makes me despair, one PR blunder after another - we thought he might have been finished but no he was just working on really surpassing himself this time.
 
if everyone calls it st james, thinks its st james, it is st james.... because it is?

if you look at it this way, the things they're doing are forcing them into a position where they have to invest and make the team better, with all this added money, barely any losses, wage and player structure, basically they're gonna have aload of money, aload of exposure and with the stability, this surely will mean we will infact be able to keep our players, if this truely is being ran in a business sense, no need to sell to make up for losses. If of course this doesn't happen and this isn't some new way of achieiving top status without the billionmillions, then they're gonna get ****ed up really - just see how it goes i say, thing about waiting is, it can be too late to say stop but personally i think the club HAS and IS going forward, too do this takes some dodgy things because the bigger world of money, forces things that adhere to the rules of the powerful rather than the best way or easiest way, this seems to be a theme of society, we let organisations set the basic rules of our independence, for MILLIONS of people, surely millions of people know themselves better than a few but you know, it's easy to change, it's just dealing with reactions.
 
@ SJP just didn't pull by the looks of it. There can't have been one single email inquiry about acquiring that one.

This is a marketing mistake, there will be fan outrage, how much doesn't really matter. The point is no company will want to be the target of the fans hatred for buying the naming rights. This isn't going to work. No ones going to 15 mio on the table to be the butt of jokes and being mentioned negatively in the press.

The way to do this is to do a cgi of a stadium fly-by and approach companies to show them what logos on the stadium could look like, actually doing it, and getting hounded for it is not good for business.

This.

If the decision can be made ridiculous it won't sell. Widespread derision is enough to prevent anyone paying for the prvilege of being derided.
 
Must have. Unless we are set to be the Puma Stadium next year.

Can anyone thing seriously of a company thats doing well in this recession to afford a sponsorship deal

Not saying these companies will sponsor us but Google, Amazon, Dominos, Ford, Intel, and Lego are all doing well under the recession. I personally hope Lego buy the rights and then rebuild our stadium with Lego bricks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.