I'm ambivalent about him leaving too to be honest. It sounds a lot like sour grapes and honestly it's not, but his brand of football is frighteningly dull. I can put up with that if you win 9 games out of 10 a la Mourinho but he's won 1 in 3 since he's been with us.
I'm so grateful to the guy because of what he's done for us. When he took over we were financially ruined and he's got rid of overrated, wrong-side-of-30 spongers and replaced them with young, talented footballers on a budget. We're in a much better position on and off the field than we were, but had he been able to deal with big-headed yet talented players (one James Bullard springs to mind) I can't help but feel we'd be higher up the league.
Mixed feelings really, mainly because of not being sure who we can replace him with. As usual exciting names have been mentioned, but some bloody horrors have been too, so I guess when the new man's appointed will we know whether we're better off or worse.
but it still happened and I'm not even sure if Blackpool got any compoAny key member of my staff who walks out can't work for another company in the same business for a minimum of three months, it's written in their contracts, just as it's written into NP's.
It does matter to the context of the conversation that the figures were brought up in. If they're so willing to spend then cough up the £2m and let's all leave this sorry episode behind.
What's the hold up? Just pay them what they want FFS.
If they really are demanding £2m, then we shouldn't just pay up. That's an obscene amount just for compo.
We paid more than twice that much for an average defender, this is our manager, if we aren't willing to pay that and would rather have a difficult situation then it would just be acting awkward.
No tribune will demand that much from us. So your club needs to be reasonable or you'll miss out.
But as I said, all you can really do is sue him for breach of contract. You can't actually stop him from starting another job.
And as I also said, contracts aren't worth the paper they're written on.
You can start him from starting another job if there's a non-competition clause in his contract. You could sue for breach of contract you're right; you could also seek an injunction to prevent him from taking over at Leicester which is the much-more likely remedy if he breaches that particular provision of his contract.
As for contracts not being "worth the paper they're written on", I can assure you from having worked on a great number of messy employment disputes, you're certainly wrong.
Assuming for a moment you are right (big assumption) - What message would that send to potential replacements - they may find the risk of being sued a bit of a negative
You may as well just not bother than take it to a tribunal. A tribunal will take weeks at minimum, in some cases they can drag it out for bloody months with a decent (or petty, your choice) set of solicitors, which I'd be willing to wager Allam will get. Also you assume a tribunal will find in your favour, which is not guaranteed.
As has been mentioned earlier, Allam is a pricky, stubborn ****hole of a business man. He's not the kind of man who let's you do what you want if it's not what he wants. I don't think he's going to let you take Pearson without a substantial amount of cash.