No, it hasn't. What's happened is the door now opening to well run clubs to compete, such as Brighton and Brentford. The days of money being the be all and end all are coming to an end. City first, then they will clamp down on whatever the **** Chelsea are doing, then they will move on to protecting younger players and the loan market abuse.
Newcastle are in a wildly good position because not only do they have backing but they have the people, the plan, the fans, the history and the reputation. Please remember, whilst it cannot count towards FFP, the owners can chuck what they want at it as long as we don't then fall into a financial deficit. That means training facilities, new stadiums, and so on can be funded with investment and it doesn't touch FFP. What City did was fast-track it, because they were a tin pot club recently in League One with next to nothing going for it. For all Ashley was horrendous, what he left was a club with a very clean balance sheet to build from. City didn't have that - they were over-spending in League One and the Championship, carrying debt then went on a ludicrous spending spree to get success quick. Their numbers today, whilst inflated, aren't unreasonable - it's their path to get there that is fraught with corruption. Newcastle United don't have many of these issues.
We're ahead of our plan. But haven't overspent or cooked the books to do it. They just got a little lucky with Eddie Howe and some incredible purchases. There will be bumps, though Gordon doesn't look like being one of them. So, yeah, we are we should be - top 4. And we've not even really started yet.
Oh it has because it can't be done like it used... nobody has done it since.
I recall villa and Everton fans telling Newcastle fans this takeover will join the long list of owners thst have failed so far to fulfill what it promised and desires.

