Yeah, after years of avoiding relegation, Sunderland eventually went down and regrouped...in league one.
Yeah I tried to stay clear of that one as it's so obvious but the similarities between the two are huge.
Yeah, after years of avoiding relegation, Sunderland eventually went down and regrouped...in league one.
Yeah I tried to stay clear of that one as it's so obvious but the similarities between the two are huge.
I wouldn't have been confident with a go-down-and-rebuild at all under Gao. But the things that SR are saying, and the money they are investing, makes me believe we are in good hands, come what may.
Have to say, and I say this as someone who wants us to go down, I think the 'go down and regroup' argument is a poor one with no real basis in reality.
Can't see how you could ever say a struggling club with £100m+ of debt would find a rebuild easier in a situation where they've lost guaranteed access to tens of millions of pounds.
For every Burnley there's a Stoke etc
I'm generally of the opinion that relegated teams ought to sell everything that moves. You don't want to get stuck with a bunch of players on high wages, many of whom really aren't happy about being in the Championship. Cash in all of the chips you accumulated in the PL, buy some Championship experience, play your youth, and rebuild. If you go straight up, great. If you don't, you aren't going to end in financial difficulty, or with the internal rot that really screwed Sunderland.
I can't see SR sticking with Saints if we go down. It will impact on their model of club ownership and with things supposedly not looking good with their Turkish club where the fans are equally disgruntled, I do not see their future being too rosy either.
It is strange why fans believe foriegn ownership of clubs is necessarily a good thing. Given the scale of Danish and Eastern European football, why do fans feel that Danes / Serbs running Saints should have such a good understanding of how things should be done? Not sure why everyone seemed to think that SR would move the club on from Gao's rather stagnant involvement ? In my opinion, there is the same kind of misguided logic with SR's descision making that marred the final years of Rupert Lowe's ownership. I am now saying that everything that SR do has been a mistake, just that when they do make errors of judgement they are catastrophic. The constant changing of personnel behind the scenes is suggestive to me that not everyone is buying in to what they are going. I would not be surprised if there was another volte face and Nathan Jones gets bombed out at the end of the season as the "data" does not support his continued tenure.
Yeah agreed. That's if you can sell them of course! Think they were stuck with Rodwell on 50k+ for another 3 years after they went down.
You also end up getting lower fees for this exact reason (clubs know you need to sell). No way will we her 50 mil plus for Prowsey as a championship club for example.
Definitely. There are some players that would be difficult to shift, but I'm fairly confident that most of our high-wage players would find homes. Might not get as much individually as we'd like, but JWP, KWP, Salisu, Che, ABK, Lavia, Livramento (if healthy) and DCC would all be relatively easy to shift, I'd imagine.
They’ve already said that they have factored in what going down would mean, and your Danish/Serbian reference is bizarre. There’s no great history of football in Abu Dhabi, but it hasn’t done City any harm. And the referenced Dane has significant success in English football at Brentford…
Definitely. There are some players that would be difficult to shift, but I'm fairly confident that most of our high-wage players would find homes. Might not get as much individually as we'd like, but JWP, KWP, Salisu, Che, ABK, Lavia, Livramento (if healthy) and DCC would all be relatively easy to shift, I'd imagine.
I haven't criticised him. But we were spending less than any other club, and earning fewer points year on year. it was inevitable.
Very true. We’re not cut adrift at all. But some teams are pulling away (forest are out of sight atm, Leeds and wet spam picked up points). We’re still in it but the clock is ticking.I don't know what is worse, watching us play football or reading the posts on here.
Take a look at the table we are not out of the running to stay up and we have owners with money trying to get the players we need.
We have to tough this out and not throw in the towel.
There is still a long way to go we must not be written off yet.
Did anyone else think Adams looked a bit unfit yesterday? Seems to be carrying a bit more timber than he used to.
Agree mostly but if we could get the ball to the current forwards more often and they take up better scoring positions etc I think we'd still be ok. But I get your point.There’s 3pts separating the bottom 7. It’s half way thro the season. There’s loads of opportunities to get out of this but I think it rests upon getting a forward who can support Adams. Without I think we’re stuffed.
i think he has been the problem for the past year. i think he wanted away from Ralph in the summer, i think he didnt want to work so hard, i think he is lost up front without a good striker to play assistant to and i think his head is gone. Im fed up listening to managers try and make him sound and feel good. id be fine if we sold him because we are not going to win games with him up front. We will do better if we get rid and play adarma up front and by better i mean a couple of points.