Unlike some from your side! Get themselves banned by being idiots. As Gordon says, civil conversation, even decent banter, is welcomed, but coming on to disrupt and cause argument is not. if we don’t have reason to ban you, we won’t ban you. End of story
I don’t think so, on the SAFC board anyway. Think I got banned from the SCUM one, tho not sure and haven’t visited there for years. Pretty sure GA wanted to get me banned before he was a mod, but was unsuccessful in getting support. Think he’ll ban me as soon as he gets a chance, as I know I got under his skin many moons ago. Either way, I couldn’t care less. But I do think this forum is largely exceptional. You just have to take some posters with a pinch of salt. Bart
No need to be coming on and purposely stirring the **** - I totally agree , but a bit of needle should be tolerated surely - from both sides. After all, we're all bloody grown men.
(And/or women) Agreed and it is. It’s when people come on to simply derail. Much like Welshie did yesterday. He won’t be posting on our board again!!!
Saff had nothing to do with it. Nothing at all. This isn’t me taking his side by the way, I just know the working of the thread and how it came to be.
This bits 100% incorrect. Come on purely to wum, (usually badly) or with a preset agenda to pick a fight with someone, and yes, you'll be removed. Pleasingly so imo. Hell I'm the proof, most of my posts are bollocks but I've never been banned.
People blaming Saff for it. Yes he had a hand but only in that the people posting it like him. He was not directly or indirectly involved. They think Gordon has an agenda with him and think it’s unfair.
Yeah maybe the clique is still here However I’ve over the years to accept it and get on with my postings I don’t post much Nevertheless I read most postings and follow the board regularly I just get on with it
They only think that I've got an agenda with him 'cos that's what he's told them, whereas you know that I haven't, don't you
Are you the one that sent Chaos a PM out of the blue asking to meet up for a fight? If so your definition of "friendly banter" appears quite loose.
Well he obviously was indirectly involved, it was clearly discussed and Tel wouldn't have posted the thread without Saff agreeing to it. Nor would Saff be unaware that brb had agreed to remove GA if the vote asked for it. The Mods have to moderate and posters have to be moderated especially when, as with Saff, he posts that he's going to destroy this board, etc, etc. As a result of this post we've lost at least one good poster, probably others, spoiled a good thread and quetened the whole place down ... .... not to mention inviting people who don't usually post, on here, who are intent on causing trouble. People have delighted in using words like div, on this board, and attacked Chunks for being weak for taking offence on behalf of his disabled child. You're obviously a friend of Saff and ignore everything he says when it suits you. This place has been busy, good natured and mainly concerned with SAFC for months. If you think the Tel thread was acceptable, in any way, I'd have to say it's you that should be removed as a Mod. There's been very little moderation needed recently tbh. It doesn't matter whether it's a job or not, you've accepted the responsibility ... ... if you don't have the time, or inclination to do it, you should say so, post a thread and see who volunteers.
