Match Day Thread Liverpool v Manchester city

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Interesting to see Trent come on and play RM leaving Milner at RB. Wonder if that's part of Klopp's long term plan with the 442/4222/424 system.

Obviously we'd need to sign a new RB to be able to move him forward though
 
his is my new favourite pundit.

no bias. actual looking at what actually went on and not talking xG and ****e.



You must log in or register to see media
 
Interesting to see Trent come on and play RM leaving Milner at RB. Wonder if that's part of Klopp's long term plan with the 442/4222/424 system.

Obviously we'd need to sign a new RB to be able to move him forward though

Wasnt really. Went to essentially a back 5 with TAA rwb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moreinjuredthanowen
don't think that is strictly true rather even if Taylor hadn't changed his mind over Haaland shirt pull he would still have been told to look at the foul on Allisson but fail to see how they can be sure he would have changed his mind on that one .
'Premier League officials have confirmed that Phil Foden's goal for Manchester City in their 1-0 defeat to Liverpool at Anfield was disallowed due to two problems in the build up to it.'

In quite a few papers.
 
'Premier League officials have confirmed that Phil Foden's goal for Manchester City in their 1-0 defeat to Liverpool at Anfield was disallowed due to two problems in the build up to it.'

In quite a few papers.
makes no sense that statement .
The statement should be that the foul on Allisson was also referred back to ref but as he had by reversing his decision on the first foul there was no need for him to review it .
 
don't think that is strictly true rather even if Taylor hadn't changed his mind over Haaland shirt pull he would still have been told to look at the foul on Allisson but fail to see how they can be sure he would have changed his mind on that one .
They did say on MotD that they'd been told the goal would have been disallowed for the second offence anyway, but they didn't expound on that.
 
They did say on MotD that they'd been told the goal would have been disallowed for the second offence anyway, but they didn't expound on that.
well if the var official had decided to just overrule on the Allisson incident why did they bother making Taylor review the first . This is just to stop Pep bleating about the overrule by implying it was always going to be disallowed anyway .

Edit : obviously i know the second was deffo a foul as i actually know the rules unlike half of PGMOL apparently .
 
Forgetting the bias of todays game - if you were to trace back - I have always said Taylor is the worst ref
And today was like a collection of his greatest hits
He tries to let a game flow but loses control of it
I am not saying he is bias against us
I am saying he is a terrible ref
Always has been
Always will be

Manchester-based Anthony Taylor? Never. :emoticon-0112-wonde
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bumps
makes no sense that statement .
The statement should be that the foul on Allisson was also referred back to ref but as he had by reversing his decision on the first foul there was no need for him to review it .

Totally.

Thats the most accruate way to describe it.

same as cricket, no need for ball tracking (guess at where it might hit stumps) if the ball pitches outside the line.

Its very clear fabinho won the ball and was pulled over by the world's strongest footballer (media loves talking him up) what happened thereafter was moot.

If the ref had decided that pull wasn't enough then he would have seen the second dangerous kick at keepers hands and had to call that as well but this wasn't needed
 
  • Like
Reactions: Solid Air