British Politics spam thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
So let me get this right, those clever Tories, 3 weeks after a vote of confidence was passed, and before the Pincher scandal, decide to plot to oust him by getting another confidence vote by changing the rules so that even LESS MPs put in letters than those who had failed to dethrone him.

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOKKKKKKKK.

Clearly you are unable to understand even the basics of how it works, so you got it wrong.

The current rule is that 15 per cent of MPs must send letters of no confidence. When 54 had written to the 1922 Committee chairman, there was a vote as the threshold was reached. That vote cannot be repeated for a year under that rule.

The idea was to add a new rule that required 25 per cent of MPs to send letters but there would be no time limit before it could be repeated. So they would have had no trouble getting 90 letters for a new confidence vote. Then it would become like the EU with Referenda – keep voting until you get it right.
 
You must log in or register to see images
 

Attachments

  • upload_2022-7-7_14-8-21.jpeg
    upload_2022-7-7_14-8-21.jpeg
    68.3 KB · Views: 33
Haha new appointments asking him to resign and quitting after a day <laugh>

at least he’s still got Mogg and Nads

Smart move getting a Cabinet job for a couple of days. It puts you up into a higher pension bracket. For years to come the taxpayer will be footing the bill for their gold-plated pensions even though they were lowly backbenchers for most of their tenure.
 
Clearly you are unable to understand even the basics of how it works, so you got it wrong.

The current rule is that 15 per cent of MPs must send letters of no confidence. When 54 had written to the 1922 Committee chairman, there was a vote as the threshold was reached. That vote cannot be repeated for a year under that rule.

The idea was to add a new rule that required 25 per cent of MPs to send letters but there would be no time limit before it could be repeated. So they would have had no trouble getting 90 letters for a new confidence vote. Then it would become like the EU with Referenda – keep voting until you get it right.

Why note do the simple thing and vote him out in the vote they'd just had? Not very bright these Tories. So they find a way to get another vote! All very nice but little to suggest he would've lost that either so really no point. Any plan they had would have to have some strategy of winning the vote itself and you mentioned none. Remember you're saying this was a week ago, before the Pincher scandal was even known about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uncle Colm



Juniors v probs.

Dorries Mong and fat arse are ****ed.

I couldn't give a **** as I am not a supporter of any Political Party. They are all completely hopeless.

You Lefty Loony Wokes however are obsessed with the Tories which is why The Labour Party are in such a state <laugh>

I thought this might have given you an inkling but obviously not. Try reading something first before putting your foot in your mouth.

You're a Tory, quite obvious to me. You never put them down.

You old poop
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Uncle Colm