British Politics spam thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I cannot help it if the brain dead on here do not like FACTS being used to rebut total bollocks that they post. Total bollocks does not require any explanation so it makes for short posts, which is why there are so many of them.

When the RMT refuses to talk to Network Rail about changes to working practices then they will be forced upon them, Mick Lynch will go the way of Arthur Scargill and half the RMT union members will be redundant.

Mick's just a typical working bloke, on £124,000 a year no matter what the outcome. And these mugs fall for it. :emoticon-0102-bigsm
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
Mick's just a typical working bloke, on £124,000 a year no matter what the outcome. And these mugs fall for it. :emoticon-0102-bigsm

Who said he’s a typical working bloke or did you make that up? Are you also suggesting anyone on decent money can’t have the interest of the workers as a priority? Interesting
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uncle Colm
Who said he’s a typical working bloke or did you make that up? Are you also suggesting anyone on decent money can’t have the interest of the workers as a priority? Interesting


Elected bloke earning the agreed amount paid for exclusively by RMT members, I hasten to add.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Treble
Who said he’s a typical working bloke or did you make that up? Are you also suggesting anyone on decent money can’t have the interest of the workers as a priority? Interesting
Didn't Mick say it? To Richard Madley the other morning? When he was asked if he is a Marxist?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego and DMD
Didn't Mick say it? To Richard Madley the other morning? When he was asked if he is a Marxist?

No idea but if that’s the case is it possible for someone to move up the pay scale without selling out those his job it is to represent?

Did you not find it strange Madley would ask such a question? Do you think he would ask say a politician with more right wing views if they are a fascist? Seems unlikely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uncle Colm
No idea but if that’s the case is it possible for someone to move up the pay scale without selling out those his job it is to represent?

Did you not find it strange Madley would ask such a question? Do you think he would ask say a politician with more right wing views if they are a fascist? Seems unlikely.
I was merely stating the fact that he said that about himself. Nothing else was implied. Madley was talking twaddle. He was called out on it. Don't be offended on someone's behalf. He was handed his arse on live tv by Mick.
 
I was merely stating the fact that he said that about himself. Nothing else was implied. Madley was talking twaddle. He was called out on it. Don't be offended on someone's behalf. He was handed his arse on live tv by Mick.

Absolutely fair. Apologies for any implication on my behalf.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uncle Colm
Who said he’s a typical working bloke or did you make that up? Are you also suggesting anyone on decent money can’t have the interest of the workers as a priority? Interesting

I said similar to another simpleton on here.

They seem to think socialism is about wanting everyone to earn less when it's about everyone earning more. <doh>

There's a difference between earning a high salary and fighting for others to earn what's fair and deserved, against those syphoning off obscene amounts whilst lecturing to others why they shouldn't get what they deserve.

If we had more people earning £124k per annum fighting for workers pay and conditions we wouldn't be in this mess. A point lost on the thick right wing dickheads who by definition are incapable of understanding the difference <doh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uncle Colm
I said similar to another simpleton on here.

They seem to think socialism is about wanting everyone to earn less when it's about everyone earning more. <doh>

There's a difference between earning a high salary and fighting for others to earn what's fair and deserved, against those syphoning off obscene amounts whilst lecturing to others why they shouldn't get what they deserve.

If we had more people earning £124k per annum fighting for workers pay and conditions we wouldn't be in this mess. A point lost on the thick right wing dickheads who by definition are incapable of understanding the difference <doh>
But there's as many working class/left wing not wanting a working class man to earn that amount of money as there are right wing people not wanting it either. Divide and conquer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
But there's as many working class/left wing not wanting a working class man to earn that amount of money as there are right wing people not wanting it either. Divide and conquer.

Absolutely agree on divide and conquer. I’ve said it a few times before all you have to look at some of the media, including social, targets over the last few years. Nhs, teachers, the national trust, the RLNI the England football team!! Pretty unthinkable a decade ago but push a narrative and yeah division is achieved. Every time there’s a need for a distraction bring up the trans community.
 
But there's as many working class/left wing not wanting a working class man to earn that amount of money as there are right wing people not wanting it either. Divide and conquer.

Most working class people will respect and support someone they see genuinely fighting for the rights of others, without caring a jot about his/her earnings.

It's only those who are looking to create a straw man that seem bothered about it. That's the real divide and conquer.
 
Most working class people will respect and support someone they see genuinely fighting for the rights of others without caring about his/her earnings.

It's only those who are looking to create a straw man that seem bothered about it. That's the real divide and conquer.
That's just people generally. Plenty of working class as well as middle and upper care about people. It's not exclusive to one class to care about people.
 
That's just people generally. Plenty of working class as well as middle and upper care about people. It's not exclusive to one class to care about people.


Yeah a couple of the charity’s I volunteer for has a total mixed bag, it’s nice to see how a good cause unites though… well unless it’s inter attack because some media **** has found an angle to push
 
That's just people generally. Plenty of working class as well as middle and upper care about people. It's not exclusive to one class to care about people.

I never said anything about caring.

You mentioned working class people not wanting someone to earn that amount and I replied to that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uncle Colm
You're pushing a narr
I never said anything about caring.

You mentioned working class people not wanting someone to earn that amount and I replied to that.
Respect, support, that's generally caring. You did actually mention the word caring in your post. You're just arguing about semantics rather than the point. Which we agree on.