British Politics spam thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Mr. Tubs de Pfeffel woe of the day. Lord Geidt his independent advisor on standards threatening to resign unless Tubs explains why he didn't break ministerial code. <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uncle Colm
Farked19 said:
Mr. Tubs de Pfeffel woe of the day. Lord Geidt his independent advisor on standards threatening to resign unless Tubs explains why he didn't break ministerial code. <laugh>
Click to expand...

The whole system is corrupt.

Starmer would be no different, probably more authoritarian than our libertarian PM.

Bottom line is, these ****s are absolute scum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Easter Road 1980
Farked19 said:
But then so are we.
Click to expand...
I’m not. I just want zero government interference in my life.

These ****s are becoming more authoritarian day by day. Still no one in the media asks why they exaggerated covid, why No 10 deliberately scared the UK population as they were having parties (and weren’t scared) then pushing the vaccine on people who were at zero risk of covid complications.

This would be an open goal for a competent opposition party but nothing.

Anyone still not awake needs to give their head a wobble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD and YourIdiotSon
It's not an open goal at all.Anti vaxxers are regarded as cranks by most of the electorate. Zero interference from government implies no fiscal interference either. A friend who I have been staying with this week argues this ( he's a JRM fan) The implications are low tax low service economy, he favours the Singapore model. But then he inherited a bloody great farm from his father. The fact that millions would freeze and/or starve us of no consequence. I do agree though on no interference in foreign wars in far away countries of which we know nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uncle Colm
Farked19 said:
It's not an open goal at all.Anti vaxxers are regarded as cranks by most of the electorate. Zero interference from government implies no fiscal interference either. A friend who I have been staying with this week argues this ( he's a JRM fan) The implications are low tax low service economy, he favours the Singapore model. But then he inherited a bloody great farm from his father. The fact that millions would freeze and/or starve us of no consequence. I do agree though on no interference in foreign wars in far away countries of which we know nothing.
Click to expand...

I wonder if they have traffic lights in Libertarian Utopia? Ever since the first walled cities, our hunter-gatherer and nomadic ancestors have pooled their resources into a community, with varying levels of fairness, but essentially societies. I don't know one libertarian that doesn't want defence and law and order but expects the market to sort out everything else. Why don't we privatise the monarchy then?

And what about the ****ing railways? In 25 years of privatisation before Covid, the public subsidy, in real terms, doubled from that which BR got, and the price of travel per passenger mile travelled trebled almost, in real terms too. And don't talk about the NHS - an NHS nurse costs us (with all their pay and pension) £300 per 12-hour shift: an agency nurse costs £1500 for the same shift. And they don't get that £1.5k - the agency gets the lion's share. Want to know to whom the private train operating companies and nursing agencies made political donations, and to whom they offered nice sinecure directorships when their political and civil service careers were ending? Welcome to the United Kingdom of Kleptopia - it's a liberation ****ing paradise.... for some.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archers Road
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back