there's this thing called google, not sure you've heard of it seeing you are young and with it and only use twitter and insta. https://www.liverpoolfc.com/news/fi...ota-gives-us-real-options-he-is-a-natural-fit jota for example
yep. Can’t be arsed digging it out but I distinctly remember an interview when asked why we bought him, he gushed about his quality. so take your meme and….well, you know the rest…
they don't count though do they. they can go rot in theory. origi out of contract minamini. nobody cares. ox? just an emergency slaah cover.
You are left with the abiding impression though - why do Liverpool always leave everything until the last second on Jan transfer day? Are they on some sort of retainer from Jim White to try and make the show more exciting?
Don’t agree on the fee. Fulham will say, we agreed a fee of £8m based on everything. Since then he’s had 6 more months of professional football, his value is now £16m to us.
That would be in very poor taste if they do that. The fee was agreed and would have gone ahead if not for an admin error, we sanctioned the Neco deal before the deadline and sold Harry Wilson but deferred the first instalment by a year so it helped the satisfy FFP requirements.
Im only saging that in reponse to Mito saging we’ll go to tribunal and low ball the offer and try get him for £4m. That would also be bad taste. Ideal world, both clubs agree the same fee and just get it done now. But if it went to tribunal and lfc tried to get him cheaper, you can’t blame Fulham for then trying to up the price.
If it goes to tribunal I believe both clubs will try to agree a fee, and if it can’t be done the Fa or whoever, then decide on it.
It was a clerical error, so I expect it to happen in the summer at roughly the same agreement as was already made. Unless either side starts to be awkward about it, in which case all future dealings would be jeopardised - which I don't see as being helpful to either.
they can say what they like when it goes to tribunal. they can produce whatever they'd like but that fee represents our compensation to get the deal done then with their permission. the value thereafter is dependent on the "loss" they've suffered and that is complicated by the lad only being there since 2014.
also on the above. this is down to LFC getting the player for less. why would we pay 8mil for a player out of contract. the reason to do it was we would be the only ones speaking to him. now we have to go in june and talk to him at which point there could be 3 or 4 clubs in. why pay 8 when you can pay 4?
