Off Topic He without sin cast the first stone

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Smug in Boots said:
You were told off by Flanders and others, on there, for disrupting the thread and making it personal. I told you to stop obsessing about me after you'd stated you wouldn't come on starting your stupid arguments ... and here you are again doing repeating the pattern.

The post on the pre-Wembley thread was a tongue in cheek 'in joke' with me and a couple of other posters, there aren't 100 people in the village, let alone ones we know. I said later in the thread, and elsewhere, that I watched alone as I expect most people did

As it happens I was taking part in the SAFSEE Zoom broadcast with Frankie and Danny ... alone, so the evidence was there for all to see.

What you don't understand, how could you, is that various posters have visited these properties, over the years, and there's often a sub-text in our posts. I'll be seeing one of them at Accrington today by coincidence.

Now ffs give it a rest and stop disrupting threads and picking arguments as you promised the board you'd do.
Click to expand...
Im not picking fights, disrupting a thread or whatever other nonsense you have just come out with.

I was posting something that was on-topic and you have just lashed out with your usual nonsense of accusing me of disrupting threads rather than hold your hands up and admit you've been a hypocrite, again.
 
The Redbaron said:
I tend to think the knives are held by those he pissed off after Brexit. If you ever meet the man you would quickly find out he is no ones mug, even if he comes across that way.
Click to expand...

Whatever else can be said about this, and most of it has been said, there is no doubt at all that the BBC have been after Johnson since the referendum, and more so since he became leader of the Tories.

Nick Robinson openly admitted this when he said that " the gloves are off now, we are going for them ".

But Johnson will be gone by the summer and he can scarcely complain. . As for Sir Kier Mr Sir Starmer, he gas done well by saying nothing. But he got carried away with his own rhetoric in the week - something he should avoid as his attempts at it are always poor - when he said in parliament that any breaking at all of the rules should mean a resignation. It was a point of principle . He can't row back from that position now, and you can't be a little bit principled.

That was a stupid thing to say, and a stupid place to say it. He, along, with probably the majority of people and MPs will have broken the rules. He will be hoping that no further photos emerge, because it is a certainty that something will be on someone's phone. You can't breathe nowadays without it being bloody recorded, so for him, it is to be hoped that any such pics are in the hands of his supporters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makemstine Roger and The Redbaron
rowley said:
Whatever else can be said about this, and most of it has been said, there is no doubt at all that the BBC have been after Johnson since the referendum, and more so since he became leader of the Tories.

Nick Robinson openly admitted this when he said that " the gloves are off now, we are going for them ".

But Johnson will be gone by the summer and he can scarcely complain. . As for Sir Kier Mr Sir Starmer, he gas done well by saying nothing. But he got carried away with his own rhetoric in the week - something he should avoid as his attempts at it are always poor - when he said in parliament that any breaking at all of the rules should mean a resignation. It was a point of principle . He can't row back from that position now, and you can't be a little bit principled.

That was a stupid thing to say, and a stupid place to say it. He, along, with probably the majority of people and MPs will have broken the rules. He will be hoping that no further photos emerge, because it is a certainty that something will be on someone's phone. You can't breathe nowadays without it being bloody recorded, so for him, it is to be hoped that any such pics are in the hands of his supporters.
Click to expand...

"it is to be hoped that any such pics are in the hands of his supporters."

Or, better still, in the public realm so the taxpayers can see how the people they elect are behaving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DH4, The Norton Cat, The Exile II and 1 other person
Smug in Boots said:
"it is to be hoped that any such pics are in the hands of his supporters."

Or, better still, in the public realm so the taxpayers can see how the people they elect are behaving.
Click to expand...

Yep. In an ideal world!

But if one of his clan have any such pictures they are unlikely to see fresh air. It will be the same for any politician, but Starmer has rather clumsily insisted on this impossible standard.

It is said that famous people, and others used to the public eye become unaware of their surroundings and often don't notice cameras, even quite obvious ones.

There will be a lot of MPs , from all over, being on the edge of their seats for a bit now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Redbaron
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back