I tend to think the knives are held by those he pissed off after Brexit. If you ever meet the man you would quickly find out he is no ones mug, even if he comes across that way.
Im not picking fights, disrupting a thread or whatever other nonsense you have just come out with. I was posting something that was on-topic and you have just lashed out with your usual nonsense of accusing me of disrupting threads rather than hold your hands up and admit you've been a hypocrite, again.
Wine Down on Friday is taking the piss like marra. Every week, every ****ing week. The piss taking party has got to stop now and bozo has to go
If you want to watch struggle, watch Angela, dear me has she ever done any research at all on what she spouts, it’s terrible to watch.
If you're not willing to discuss why we're in this position in the first place because it makes you uncomfortable, you could just say that.
Whatever else can be said about this, and most of it has been said, there is no doubt at all that the BBC have been after Johnson since the referendum, and more so since he became leader of the Tories. Nick Robinson openly admitted this when he said that " the gloves are off now, we are going for them ". But Johnson will be gone by the summer and he can scarcely complain. . As for Sir Kier Mr Sir Starmer, he gas done well by saying nothing. But he got carried away with his own rhetoric in the week - something he should avoid as his attempts at it are always poor - when he said in parliament that any breaking at all of the rules should mean a resignation. It was a point of principle . He can't row back from that position now, and you can't be a little bit principled. That was a stupid thing to say, and a stupid place to say it. He, along, with probably the majority of people and MPs will have broken the rules. He will be hoping that no further photos emerge, because it is a certainty that something will be on someone's phone. You can't breathe nowadays without it being bloody recorded, so for him, it is to be hoped that any such pics are in the hands of his supporters.
"it is to be hoped that any such pics are in the hands of his supporters." Or, better still, in the public realm so the taxpayers can see how the people they elect are behaving.
Yep. In an ideal world! But if one of his clan have any such pictures they are unlikely to see fresh air. It will be the same for any politician, but Starmer has rather clumsily insisted on this impossible standard. It is said that famous people, and others used to the public eye become unaware of their surroundings and often don't notice cameras, even quite obvious ones. There will be a lot of MPs , from all over, being on the edge of their seats for a bit now.
Yes... You. To be honest though I am quite impressed that you have managed to post twice without using the word "Labour".
Life is too short to argue with anybody. You seem to think differently and will argue black is white to suit your narrative.Have an ignore by the way. Goodbye
