Mags embarrassing themselves yet again

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Charlie Dogscock said:
Ah Malaga my old friend.

Yes I also remember that, there was a joking post after you won the Checkatrade trophy about how following the Mackems model was key to success if we wanted to win anything. You seemed the think the post was serious and started an argument with me about it; I didn't know whether you were on the autistic spectrum or just being deliberately stupid, but anyone who's interested can search through our posts and read it for themselves.
Click to expand...
Really?
And you ask if he's being deliberately stupid!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makemstine Roger
Charlie Dogscock said:
Ah Malaga my old friend.

Yes I also remember that, there was a joking post after you won the Checkatrade trophy about how following the Mackems model was key to success if we wanted to win anything. You seemed the think the post was serious and started an argument with me about it; I didn't know whether you were on the autistic spectrum or just being deliberately stupid, but anyone who's interested can search through our posts and read it for themselves.
Click to expand...
To be fair he was right, we won a trophy. Your last success was finishing equal 11th and thus getting a certificate
 
  • Like
Reactions: C Montgomery Burns, ISOE II and Makemstine Roger
Ozzymac said:
That's right, the same Burnley who their new 25 million pound striker played for. the same Burnley who are the only team that failed to score against them. That Burnley
Click to expand...

Tbf "that Burnley" are our best chance of staying up, so surely you can see the logic in paying over the odds for the guy who's been their top scorer for the last 4 years?
 
  • Like
Reactions: magpie290761
Charlie Dogscock said:
Tbf "that Burnley" are our best chance of staying up, so surely you can see the logic in paying over the odds for the guy who's been their top scorer for the last 4 years?
Click to expand...
I could see the logic in previous years but he's done **** all this year.

If anything you'vr probably helped Burnley because they'll change their style of play. Your lot put less crosses into the box than Burnley and that is where Woods is most dangerous yet he;s only got 3 for Burnley this season. Who's going to deliver the balls to him?
 
  • Like
Reactions: malagamackem
Ozzymac said:
I could see the logic in previous years but he's done **** all this year.

If anything you'vr probably helped Burnley because they'll change their style of play. Your lot put less crosses into the box than Burnley and that is where Woods is most dangerous yet he;s only got 3 for Burnley this season. Who's going to deliver the balls to him?
Click to expand...

Tbh no one at Burnley has done anything this year, we'll see how things pan out with him here.

Crosses? ASM, Almiron, Longstaff, even Shelvey. Supply hasn't been the problem, just that there's no one on the end of the crosses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: magpie290761
  • Like
Reactions: C Montgomery Burns, malagamackem, Blond Bombshell and 1 other person
Charlie Dogscock said:
Tbh no one at Burnley has done anything this year, we'll see how things pan out with him here.

Crosses? ASM, Almiron, Longstaff, even Shelvey. Supply hasn't been the problem, just that there's no one on the end of the crosses.
Click to expand...
And just for clarity, Ritchie has supplied 1/3 of of crosses :)

You must log in or register to see images
 
  • Like
Reactions: C Montgomery Burns, malagamackem and Makemstine Roger
Charlie Dogscock said:
Tbh no one at Burnley has done anything this year, we'll see how things pan out with him here.

Crosses? ASM, Almiron, Longstaff, even Shelvey. Supply hasn't been the problem, just that there's no one on the end of the crosses.
Click to expand...
So in summary it would appear that you don't even know where your crosses come from and that basically you're full of **** living in dreamland
 
  • Like
Reactions: Philftm, DH4, rowley and 8 others
Ozzymac said:
Ok then. Is this opinion based on facts or opinion?

You must log in or register to see images


By the way that is the Premier League website stats https://www.premierleague.com/stats/top/clubs/total_cross
Click to expand...
That's weird seeing Newcastle at the bottom of a league table...are we sure? This must be a conspiracy by the Premier League against the Jawed Nayshun, where most of their crosses are disallowed by VAR, and that the referees are in on the conspiracy. Or am I making things up?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DH4, Ozzymac, C Montgomery Burns and 2 others
Ozzymac said:
So in summary it would appear that you don't even know where your crosses come from and that basically you're full of **** living in dreamland
Click to expand...

That's still 301 crosses which is hardly an area of concern, vs Burnley thats an average of 16 a game vs their 21 a game.

I repeat, crosses are not the issue, just people putting the ****ing thing in the net, we're averaging one goal a game, which is clearly due to the lack of a decent striker, as only Wilson scores regularly and he's injured a lot of the time.

ASM regularly runs down the wings and takes players on, but most of the time has no one to cross to as there's no strikers in the box, thus there's no chance to cross. Ritchie takes corners and free kicks, in open play more chances come from ASM.
 
Last edited:
malagamackem said:
That's weird seeing Newcastle at the bottom of a league table...are we sure? This must be a conspiracy by the Premier League against the Jawed Nayshun, where most of their crosses are disallowed by VAR, and that the referees are in on the conspiracy. Or am I making things up?
Click to expand...

17th isn't bottom, 20th is, so yeah you're making things up.
 
Charlie Dogscock said:
That's still 301 crosses which is hardly an area of concern, vs Burnley thats an average of 16 a game vs their 21 a game.

I repeat, crosses are not the issue, just people putting the ****ing thing in the net, we're averaging one goal a game, which is clearly due to the lack of a decent striker, as only Wilson scores regularly and he's injured a lot of the time.

ASM regularly runs down the wings and takes players on, but most of the time has no one to cross to as there's no strikers in the box, thus there's no chance to cross. Ritchie takes corners and free kicks, in open play more chances come from ASM.
Click to expand...

I think if we were the fourth worst at something in the league I'd see it as a point of concern that needs addressing. I think everyone would if they're being honest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C Montgomery Burns
Charlie Dogscock said:
17th isn't bottom, 20th is, so yeah you're making things up.
Click to expand...
Does maxim ever put a cross in? I like him mind as he’s a defenders nightmare but he’s certainly not a get to by line and whip it in type of player.
Shelvey crosses from too deep to cause any real problems and Almiron (the genius rafas record signing) never seems to do anything constructive.
It’s all very well blaming strikers but whenever I’ve watched you lot the supply line is pretty limited so they’re feeding off scraps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: malagamackem
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back