Transfer Rumours Transfer window Summer 2021

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Pleased we are not sending Joe Walsh out on loan. With Seny off to the Africa Nations in deep mid winter we will need a back up plan in case Archer gets injured. I do of course hope that this is the reason and Seny isn’t being pursued by the likes of Sheffield Utd
 
Quite Possibly Raving said:
I guess they see Field as first choice here and Ball as adequate back up
Click to expand...

I haven't seen enough of Field to judge him. Ball has done well enough in some aspects, but there does seem to be a structural problem which we've seen particularly in first halves. Coventry's fast men were cutting through us like a hot knife through butter
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hoop-Leif and Quite Possibly Raving
stick said:
72 grand a week....!!!!!!
Click to expand...

Whaaaaat? Seriously?

F*ck a duck..... so we could stretch to 15% of that......

No wonder those relegated clubs have such a huge advantage over the rest of us if they have the funds to pay those sort of wages in the championship......
 
Goldhawk-Road said:
I haven't seen enough of Field to judge him. Ball has done well enough in some aspects, but there does seem to be a structural problem which we've seen particularly in first halves. Coventry's fast men were cutting through us like a hot knife through butter
Click to expand...

Same on Field really but I'm hopeful - I keep saying this, which is alien for a QPR fan, but I trust the management! :emoticon-0100-smile
 
  • Like
Reactions: Goldhawk-Road and Ninj
Quite Possibly Raving said:
Same on Field really but I'm hopeful - I keep saying this, which is alien for a QPR fan, but I trust the management! :emoticon-0100-smile
Click to expand...
Ive seen enough of Field to know hes a very good footballer, even more so at this level. Hes a distant relative of mine (3rd cousin) or something like that. He is a presence, being a big lad and complements Johanson very well. If fit then i imagine that they would be the choice pairing. As for Gray, its all about options. Austin and Dykes both like to drop slightly deeper and neither are pacey to latch on to any through balls. Gray could play with either. Chair and Willock wont be able to play every game this season (although Barbet manages it). Its a very shrewd bit of business if you ask me. Any defender will tell you that pace is the hardest thing to mark.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorwayRanger, Goldhawk-Road, rangercol and 9 others
I mean lets be honest here, if someone said at the beginning of the season that we could be selecting from Dykes, Austin or Gray as our forward line then im sure we would have taken that all day long. Also gives the opportunity for Kelman to maybe go out on loan for some regular game time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mcytiger, NorwayRanger, QPR Oslo and 2 others
bobmid said:
I mean lets be honest here, if someone said at the beginning of the season that we could be selecting from Dykes, Austin or Gray as our forward line then im sure we would have taken that all day long. Also gives the opportunity for Kelman to maybe go out on loan for some regular game time.
Click to expand...
True, just didn't see it as our priority if we were looking to get a loan signing in this late on
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobmid
QPR999 said:
You must log in or register to see media

You must log in or register to see media
Click to expand...

Attacking options - this is exactly why we needed Gray, We can now pick 3 from 5 rather than 3 from 4, plus he'll add the pace up top that we were lacking. An excellent loan signing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back