I dont know how much of the thread you read I just think that people who cannot accept that god may have 'just existed' cannot say that matter and energy 'just existed' If the latter is true then based on what we know a creator without a beginning or end is plausible
I brought him up because you were being similarly evasive about your job and you know him. I thought he might have given you a few tips! If you asked him, then I'm sure you'll have no trouble telling us. You're claiming that I'm wrong without saying that he doesn't receive the benefits that I've suggested. He's admitted to the minor, largely irrelevant benefits that a lot of people get. He doesn't seem to deny being on income support. Is he? What proof or evidence have I denied? You don't seem to understand what an internet warrior is, either. I don't ever act tough on here or suggest that I'm a hardman.
You didn't answer it using the link that I posted, as the link supports it. I was asking who created god in reply to your claim that everything has a creator, which is not one that I accept. I was pointing out the flaw in your logic. Evidence suggests that matter and energy cannot be destroyed or created. Evidence doesn't suggest that god even exists.
@ Fan I know **** all about energy,matter,antimatter or evolution but if there is a all seeing,all knowing Deity then why the **** are one week old children dieing with starvation?What the **** did they do to anyone? Why would a 'God' let babies die and let ****s let Ian Huntley live?
Some people do believe that. I don't. I don't think that Iraq had anything to do with that form of Islamic terrorism, at all. Wasn't Saddam an enemy of Al-Qaeda? You'd have to ask where all these militants were when he was butchering their countrymen, though. It's a poor situation that nobody particularly comes out of well. George Bush did, though. Financially.
evasive? where you been? I have never held back on crtain information in fact ask ST Methinks you are being faecaetious (sp) ask him, I will arrange the meeting. come on you purveyor of evidence/proof I am putting on a plate the direct source to a question you are discussing with me, no take up As for Internet Warrior you have said more than ones that you cant allow certainthings to go unchallenged etc (may words thought I would clarify as you like semantics) but when given the source you have bottled it
no you are being tedious it has been answered. here read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_the_eye You not accepting it does not make it any less true. Unless you can prove it logically everything has a source/origin/creator so the conclusion is valid
I've already pointed out that I have no interest in meeting him. I'd have nothing to gain and there'd be nothing to stop him from lying, refusing to answer or evading any questions put to him. He does so in interviews all the time, so why would a meeting with me be any different? I could easily meet him on my own anyway, as he's hardly a massive distance from where I live. How does refusing to allow bullshit to stand unchallenged in any way represent acting like a hardman? Have I ever threatened anyone or suggested anything violent? I guess it's just another term that you don't understand the real meaning of.
What?! What part of that even challenges the evolution of the eye? It explains it! Everything doesn't logically have a source. I've shown you that time and again. I refuse to believe that you're this stupid. If you're making the claim that everything does have a source, then you have to prove it.
At least you are honest enough to say that. These lot wont accept wikki but source t anyway The answer to your question is complicated in all honesty But for me the conclusion is not wether god exists or not. Let me explain using ethiopia. Now under the Islamic caliphate ethipoia was a country that exported foodstuff to other parts of the world today it si in poverty and children are dying Yet we know that these countries are still able to export, just not use domestically People blame God (again I dont like that word as it paints the wrong picture) but its the actions of us (man) that has caused that A simple way to explain it would be that if you are speeding and get killed is that Gods fault?
Exactly! Ask Jamie Bulgers parents if there is a god, and countless others that have lost children to the ill done deeds of monsters. Funny thing is because of religious beliefs some of them forgive the perpetrators of such obscene crimes. Sad really, but if there is a god he is a **** and doing a really bad job and should be sacked forthwith.
I don't think he's smart enough, to be honest. He barely strikes me as being clever enough to tie his own shoelaces, but that might all be an act. [video=youtube;JvknGT8W5jA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvknGT8W5jA[/video] Seriously, where the **** did that guy go?
Despite what? The fact that meeting him wouldn't benefit me in any way? Why would I be scared to meet him? He's not a violent man, in person. Too much of a coward for that.
natural selection does NOT fit the evolution of the eye also see Cambrian explosion logically everything has a source. even energy has a source nothing exists without a source
more assumptions/assertions yet scared to meet him You raised the matter, there is a simple solution but you dont want that coward methinks
Yes it does. How does natural selection not fit the evolution of the eye? Prove it. What's the source of energy or matter?
More baseless claims. I've already pointed out why there's no point in me meeting him. Why wouldn't he refuse to answer my questions, evade them or even outright lie? You have no answer to that, so you're just repeating the same old bullshit, just as you are with your accusation of cowardice. Why would I be scared of him? What is it that you think I believe he'll do to me?
