Coronavirus

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Boris...


  • Total voters
    24
Status
Not open for further replies.
that wouldn't constitute fraud just mismanagement of Govt funds .For a fraud conviction you would need to prove personal gain ( or loss to another ) and i doubt any were dumb enough to make that obvious this soon .

I wouldn’t have any money on that tbh. The misappropriation of public funds is serious enough in itself, however I’d wager there’s a few twitchy arseholes within the Tory ranks hoping that there’s no evidence of purely coincidental gifts and donations. Always follow the money.......
 
I wouldn’t have any money on that tbh. The misappropriation of public funds is serious enough in itself, however I’d wager there’s a few twitchy arseholes within the Tory ranks hoping that there’s no evidence of purely coincidental gifts and donations. Always follow the money.......
ah but the donation was to just to help with our campaign for <insert anything that may be even slightly appropriate> and anyway Civil Servants made the decision* .

* came as a bit of a shock to them as well
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes
I wouldn’t have any money on that tbh. The misappropriation of public funds is serious enough in itself, however I’d wager there’s a few twitchy arseholes within the Tory ranks hoping that there’s no evidence of purely coincidental gifts and donations. Always follow the money.......

follow the money reminds me of the documentary about 9/11 not shown on mainstream of course.

daylight robbewy at it’s finest
 
ah but the donation was to just to help with our campaign for <insert anything that may be even slightly appropriate> and anyway Civil Servants made the decision* .

* came as a bit of a shock to them as well

anyway when’s Andrew gonna get arrested for his Repulsive evil lifestyle.

dont worry I don’t want an answer just keeping thing’s highlighted just Incase we end up forgetting we are allowing the worst type of criminal to spend our taxes on children
 
I wouldn’t have any money on that tbh. The misappropriation of public funds is serious enough in itself, however I’d wager there’s a few twitchy arseholes within the Tory ranks hoping that there’s no evidence of purely coincidental gifts and donations. Always follow the money.......
There was a Danish crime drama called Follow The Money that ran on I think BBC4 maybe More 4 about 4 years ago .
It ran for 3 series I think .
It perfectly summed up the level or corruption that exists in major democracies .
 
Nothing is shown on main stream mate, you have to dig real deep to find something that suits you :bandit:

funny you should say that I found a program about Zionism the other day called til kingdom come showing the yank evangelicals getting fleeced by Zionist salesmen.............was originally on the bbc which isn’t the norm for mainstream filth was probably tucked away on bbc3 at two in the morning so no **** seen it mind
 
ah but the donation was to just to help with our campaign for <insert anything that may be even slightly appropriate> and anyway Civil Servants made the decision* .

* came as a bit of a shock to them as well

Haha, that would be the usual line without doubt. Only this time they’ve got a real issue with that cover all, as they themselves created a sort of VIP list of companies who could be supposedly trusted without the usual due diligence being applied due to the urgency of demand. Which in itself isn’t maybe a major issue, until you look at the detail and see businesses that were literally new start ups with a net worth of £100, that dropped for multi million £ contracts. It ****ing reeks to high heaven, hence the ‘not in the public interest’ attempt at silencing court actions, which has failed miserably, as they haven’t quite got to the point where they also completely control the judicial process YET.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aberdude
I think I might have coronavirus.. I've had the ****s for 6 days.. I didn't realise it but apparently you can display only gastrointestinal symptoms.. Anyone heard of anyone having that issue?
 
funny you should say that I found a program about Zionism the other day called til kingdom come showing the yank evangelicals getting fleeced by Zionist salesmen.............was originally on the bbc which isn’t the norm for mainstream filth was probably tucked away on bbc3 at two in the morning so no **** seen it mind
err BBC3 was removed from tele years ago

It was on BBC4 though ..
 
Haha, that would be the usual line without doubt. Only this time they’ve got a real issue with that cover all, as they themselves created a sort of VIP list of companies who could be supposedly trusted without the usual due diligence being applied due to the urgency of demand. Which in itself isn’t maybe a major issue, until you look at the detail and see businesses that were literally new starts up with a net worth of £100, that dropped for multi million £ contracts. It ****ing reeks to high heaven, hence the ‘not in the public interest’ attempt at silencing court actions, which has failed miserably, as they haven’t quite got to the point where they also completely control the judicial process YET.

what about the one where we gave a company Tory connected millions of our money for a ferry port for brexit and they didn’t even have a coracle let along a ferry.

carpet, brush, Alzheimer’s
 
I think I might have coronavirus.. I've had the ****s for 6 days.. I didn't realise it but apparently you can display only gastrointestinal symptoms.. Anyone heard of anyone having that issue?

Apparently according to who? Facebook?
 
Haha, that would be the usual line without doubt. Only this time they’ve got a real issue with that cover all, as they themselves created a sort of VIP list of companies who could be supposedly trusted without the usual due diligence being applied due to the urgency of demand. Which in itself isn’t maybe a major issue, until you look at the detail and see businesses that were literally new starts up with a net worth of £100, that dropped for multi million £ contracts. It ****ing reeks to high heaven, hence the ‘not in the public interest’ attempt at silencing court actions, which has failed miserably, as they haven’t quite got to the point where they also completely control the judicial process YET.
I did laugh when Hancock was spouting on after the recent case that these companies were producing vitally needed PPE when even with a tiny amount of knowledge on this subject you know that "companies" were awarded contracts to source PPE not produce it .
Though quite why a myriad of companies was better than just using one or 2 . experienced procurement firms is beyond me .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Edelman
Status
Not open for further replies.