Mass vaccination centres opening up, still for the priority groups of course.
So over 80 year olds within a 45 minute drive of one of these centres are being offered appointments.
Anyone else see some potential issues with this?
Mass vaccination centres opening up, still for the priority groups of course.
So over 80 year olds within a 45 minute drive of one of these centres are being offered appointments.
Anyone else see some potential issues with this?
France should follow Germany:Nearly fell off my chair this morning when I heard Piers Morgan say positive things about the UK's government roll out of the vaccination.......
At least you appear to have it organised and the logistical side of things sorted, whilst we're still waiting for the EU to approve the Oxford/Zenica vaccine. I read in the papers yesterday that the EU regulatory crowd required a lot more data form Oxford and that will only be handed over to the regulator later this week. They hope to have it approved by the end of the week.......
Meanwhile we are only getting something like 35000 doses of the Pfizer vaccine delivered per week and have apparently an order for 4000 doses of the Modena one.....doesn't even begin to scratch the surface......
France should follow Germany:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...eaching-eu-rules-purchasing-supplies-vaccine/
I am just pleased we weren't part of the that EU approach as they didn't order enough.
https://www.politico.eu/article/clement-beaune-interview-coronavirus-vaccines-defends-eu/
Our government dodged a bullet there? Funny it's all gone silent on that front?
On a serious note, I hope all countries will get vaccinated quickly, including the poor countries who really need it as well. The whole thing needs to go away.
Sorry Ellers, just like Matt Hancock... Not quite right
Covid vaccine decisions have little to do with Brexit
You must log in or register to see images
James Kane
02 December 2020
The UK has managed the feat of becoming the first Western country to approve a Covid vaccine. But Brexit isn’t the reason why and it could make the roll-out harder, writes James Kane
Shortly after the announcement that the UK’s medicines regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), had approved the first Covid vaccine to be rolled out, health secretary Matt Hancock asserted that it was “because of Brexit” that the UK had been able to do this ahead of its EU neighbours. The government also explained its refusal to participate in the joint EU vaccine purchasing scheme earlier this year by saying that it could secure doses more quickly itself. Others, however, have claimed that Brexit will actually make the rollout of the UK’s vaccination programme more difficult. Who is right?
The UK will be faster off the vaccine mark than its neighbours
The government has stated that the first doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine will be administered in the week of 7 December. This makes it the first Western country to approve the widespread rollout of a vaccine: the US is likely to follow in a week or so, while the EU is unlikely to approve any Covid vaccine for use until the start of 2021. At a time when hundreds of people are still dying of coronavirus daily, the UK authorities’ speed in approving a vaccine could well save lives.
The UK is also better supplied with vaccines than its EU neighbours. The UK authorities have bought more vaccine doses per head of population than almost any other country in the world, with contracts signed for over five doses per Briton. Only Canada and the US have bought more. The EU’s joint procurement scheme has acquired only three doses for each European citizen.
The UK could have followed the same course of vaccine action if it were an EU member
That said, none of these successes can be chalked up to Brexit. As the chief executive of the MHRA swiftly pointed out, Mr Hancock was wrong to say that the UK could approve the vaccine early because it was no longer subject to EU rules. The MHRA’s decision was taken in accordance with the relevant EU legislation, which allows member states to grant temporary authorisation for a medicinal product in response to the spread of infectious diseases (among others). [1] This legislation still applies to the UK until the end of the transition period. Any EU member state could have used the same provision of the legislation to approve the vaccine. They decided not to for political and technical reasons, not legal ones.
Similarly, the member states were in no way obliged to take part in the EU’s joint vaccine procurement scheme. The EU has very limited competences for public health under its founding treaties: it can take action only to “support, coordinate or supplement the actions of the Member States”. The EU member states in this case voluntarily decided to opt into the joint procurement scheme. If one or more of them had decided to follow the UK’s path and procure its own vaccines, no one would have stopped them.
Just to confirm I was not saying it as a Brexit thing... Just glad we are not part of the scheme.Scotland and Sturgeon benefitting from being part of the U.K. when it comes to the vaccination programme. Can’t imagine they’d be where they are if they were part of the EU.
Anyone heard anything from Stainesy recently? Just reading some of the stories about ambulance crews, must be a worrying time all round...
Anyone heard anything from Stainesy recently? Just reading some of the stories about ambulance crews, must be a worrying time all round...
He says it's an absolute nightmare.
Lot of paramedic crews off sick or isolating, long waits at the hospitals due to lack of beds, have to scrub the ambulance after each job, over half his jobs are Covid related.
He's on Facebook and seems ok.
Just taking a break from the **** fest on here I think.

Sorry Ellers, just like Matt Hancock... Not quite right
Covid vaccine decisions have little to do with Brexit
You must log in or register to see images
James Kane
02 December 2020
The UK has managed the feat of becoming the first Western country to approve a Covid vaccine. But Brexit isn’t the reason why and it could make the roll-out harder, writes James Kane
Shortly after the announcement that the UK’s medicines regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), had approved the first Covid vaccine to be rolled out, health secretary Matt Hancock asserted that it was “because of Brexit” that the UK had been able to do this ahead of its EU neighbours. The government also explained its refusal to participate in the joint EU vaccine purchasing scheme earlier this year by saying that it could secure doses more quickly itself. Others, however, have claimed that Brexit will actually make the rollout of the UK’s vaccination programme more difficult. Who is right?
The UK will be faster off the vaccine mark than its neighbours
The government has stated that the first doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine will be administered in the week of 7 December. This makes it the first Western country to approve the widespread rollout of a vaccine: the US is likely to follow in a week or so, while the EU is unlikely to approve any Covid vaccine for use until the start of 2021. At a time when hundreds of people are still dying of coronavirus daily, the UK authorities’ speed in approving a vaccine could well save lives.
The UK is also better supplied with vaccines than its EU neighbours. The UK authorities have bought more vaccine doses per head of population than almost any other country in the world, with contracts signed for over five doses per Briton. Only Canada and the US have bought more. The EU’s joint procurement scheme has acquired only three doses for each European citizen.
The UK could have followed the same course of vaccine action if it were an EU member
That said, none of these successes can be chalked up to Brexit. As the chief executive of the MHRA swiftly pointed out, Mr Hancock was wrong to say that the UK could approve the vaccine early because it was no longer subject to EU rules. The MHRA’s decision was taken in accordance with the relevant EU legislation, which allows member states to grant temporary authorisation for a medicinal product in response to the spread of infectious diseases (among others). [1] This legislation still applies to the UK until the end of the transition period. Any EU member state could have used the same provision of the legislation to approve the vaccine. They decided not to for political and technical reasons, not legal ones.
Similarly, the member states were in no way obliged to take part in the EU’s joint vaccine procurement scheme. The EU has very limited competences for public health under its founding treaties: it can take action only to “support, coordinate or supplement the actions of the Member States”. The EU member states in this case voluntarily decided to opt into the joint procurement scheme. If one or more of them had decided to follow the UK’s path and procure its own vaccines, no one would have stopped them.
They have asked for more information on the data ..as Stan alluded, possibly not a wrong...for instance the time between first and second dose and also this anomalies regarding the dosages.The EU haven't even given the go ahead for the Oxford vaccine.
In this particular instance it's patently obvious that we were better off not being tied to the EU's political decisions.
And I can see this being replicated down south too....
Scottish lower leagues & Scottish Cup suspended for three weeks
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/55616399
They have asked for more information on the data ..as Stan alluded, possibly not a wrong...for instance the time between first and second dose and also this anomalies regarding the dosages.
We are definitely better off not being involved, but I am pretty sure we never would have been...having generated the vaccine here in the first place
Fair enough.I think a lot of us are trying to see the positives in the vaccine roll out tbh.
yeah, I don’t think the EU is set up for large scale non economic emergency activity. Their vaccine purchasing has allegedly been ****ed up by the French insisting that the Sanofi version, some way off being ready, should be the major workhorse. Very messy.The EU haven't even given the go ahead for the Oxford vaccine.
In this particular instance it's patently obvious that we were better off not being tied to the EU's political decisions.