Away in a manger?
That wasn't the point regarding Morley, but twist it to prove yours by all means.
The point was some players listen too much too their agents too early in their careers. Cannot comment on Nick Powell because he was never our player.
Clucas ? we made good money on him, which is probably going somewhere to paying the 150 or so wage packets at the club today.
Tom Mince ? we doubled our money on him in less then a year, which isnt bad for a player who's had more clubs then Tiger Woods.
James Chester, very good signing by City for peanuts, did a job for us and he moved on , what's the problem there ?
Even though they can't even go to support the team.I demand 100% commitment to the team, from the vice chairman
And good luck to him but he could have done that playing for his home town club. That was my point. Young players just breaking though in the game and making a name for themselves also throw themselves at the mercy of an agent who probably has half a dozen or more similar players under his belt.OK, but wasn't your main point about Josh Tymon? Some people on here didn't rate him and some even appeared to want his career to fail after Hull City but after a bit of a stutter he seems to be doing OK doesn't he?
And good luck to him but he could have done that playing for his home town club.
You wont object if KLP leaves in a fortnight for the same reasons then ?If he’d wanted to earn 80% less and play at a lower level...
You wont object if KLP leaves in a fortnight for the same reasons then ?
This time last month KLP was the first name on the team sheet, enter his agent and the **** hits the fan. So if it isn't about money, what is it about ? knowing that KLP has said that he is not money motivated, so who is in this case ?You suggested his agent was only interested in money, not the best interest of his client, but in this case he just did his job and got his client a far better deal.
And if KLP leaves in two weeks, I’ll just pop it on the list, under Ehab ****-up No.238.
This time last month KLP was the first name on the team sheet, enter his agent and the **** hits the fan. So if it isn't about money, what is it about ? knowing that KLP has said that he is not money motivated, so who is in this case ?
The financial side has already been agreed, says McCann.This time last month KLP was the first name on the team sheet, enter his agent and the **** hits the fan. So if it isn't about money, what is it about ? knowing that KLP has said that he is not money motivated, so who is in this case ?
I thought Ehab was just trying to tie KLP to the club on a longer contract, like the club have been doing with a lot of younger players ? That surely is the chairman's job, keeping hold on his best young talent ? You quoted the Tymon episode on another thread and in that case the club lost out, so don't you think it is wise of Ehab not to want the same to happen here ?It’s no secret, it’s about contract length.
The whole point of a new deal like this, is to improve his terms, reward his success and to secure a future asset. Ehab, as is so often the case, just manages to make player want to leave instead.
Totally agree, unless there is more to this then we can imagine, like KLP suddenly triggers a massive pay rise or bonus the next time he starts a game, but surely it cannot be that large to want to keep him as a sub for the rest of his days and he never starts a game for us again?Unsure as to what KLP's wage rise would be if he started the next match, but it may improve the situation a touch if he were to start it. Goodwill never goes amiss.
Unsure as to what KLP's wage rise would be if he started the next match, but it may improve the situation a touch if he were to start it. Goodwill never goes amiss.
On this alone, Ehab is right.he said too much the last time and has had a flea in his ear from Ehab.
On this alone, Ehab is right.