I presume you are talking about the demos planned for the 29th being banned - in which case all demos (counter ones as well) have been banned for that day. The reason for this, and for the breaking up of the last demo, was a matter of protecting public health - 20,000 people throwing their masks away was not in accordance with what the organizers had agreed to beforehand. You may see it as interfering with freedom - but when you approach me without a mask it sends out a signal which says 'My freedom is more important than your health' - freedoms end when they endanger public health. I could just as easily come up to you and blow my cigarette smoke in your direction and justify it by saying that it is my right - but I would never dream of doing that. What does this have to do with what you call 'Climate change fraud' ? Please try to stick to the theme at hand without using Covid 19 as a stick to lash out at anything you don't like.
You should tell the audience the truth about the first demonstration that took place on August 1st in Berlin. The corrupted media reported 17 - 20 thousand demonstrators on the Street 17. June in Berlin - it is a HUGE street in Berlin and of course the figures had been right then there should not have been any problems with that at all. Fact is that there were around 1,3 Million people that day and of course this time they expected around 3 - 4 million people. Fact is that the Government in Germany will fall very, very soon and that is why they have violated the German Basic Law of Free speach and Assembly. Never mind, most of the people will go there anyway and I will be one of them. Covid-19 is a no more deadly than any other flu in recent years and it was only created to shut up the stupid. But you will soon find out that that more and more people are "waking up" and accomplices like yourself will find out what it means being on the wrong side. We will go after them of course.
Oooo I believe that it was taken as a weekly total and has gone down however today’s figures are up on yesterday’s Just to clarify.
For the benefit of 'The audience' the area concerned for this demo was on the 'Straße des 17 Juni' between 'Großem Stern and Brandenburger Tor. In order to reach 1.3 million in this area people would have had to be sitting on each others shoulders 3-4 high packed together like sardines. The same area was used for public viewing during the 2006 World Cup where 120,000 watched the Germany v Poland match and they were packed like sardines in a tin. So I am afraid it is not me that is avoiding the truth. Also - for the benefit of 'the audience' would you like to tell us more about the 'we' referred to here - a question which you have avoided thus far.
CORONAVIRUS figures in England have fallen for the first time in six weeks as the number of people testing positive dipped by almost 10 per cent. Promising new NHS figures showed the total number of people being tested positive for the virus fell week-on-week for the first time since July. Maybe You should know what you are talking about before you try to act smart? Sadly it doesn’t go with your intellect.
There is some confusion about these figures - in absolute terms the number of new infections is rising in the UK but the percentage of those being tested as positive may be dropping. In order to make any sense of this then you would need to know a) how many are being tested (only applying to first test, not subsequent ones) and b) the criteria used for testing. What is clear is that the spike in cases (second wave if you like to call it that) in most European countries has not been accompanied by a spike in deaths and the percentage (and absolute numbers) of those classified as serious/critical is also going down. The reasons for this are not known - they could be that there is a time gap between infection and death and a spike in deaths is to come. Or it could be that with the end of the holiday period a high proportion of those being currently infected are young. Or it could be that the virus itself is mutating into a more infectious but less deadly form (which would make sense from a biological point of view). Or there could be other statistical reasons for this. If this virus follows the general pattern of other viruses then it will mutate into a less dangerous form more similar to a normal flu infection ie. something we can live with - the Spanish, Asian and Hong Kong influenza all developed in this way and we still have them today. But such a mutation takes time (probably less time than waiting for a vaccination available for everyone) and at some point we will say 'we can live with this' but when will that be.
As I said before...it’s complicated. It’s not about trying to prove a point here. I was Just saying what Sky news said In that infections had fallen which on the week to week chart is correct however yesterday was a daily increase on the day before. It all gets very confusing. However it’s sorted now.
I have attached a nice video from the United Nations for you little ignorant Covid-19 believer... United Nations Song - New World Order Behind Closed Doors
Since most here did not bother having a closer look at "The Great Reset" I have attached what the WEF (World Economic Forum) had created before the "vicious" virus was released on us. How could an organization like the WEF possibly create such a detailed strategic intelligence - all related to Covid-19 - before it´s "breakout" ? Anyway, very intriguing and by simply registering all details can be looked up. https://intelligence.weforum.org/topics/a1G0X000006O6EHUA0?tab=publications
This document dates back to March 2020 - do you think a thing like this can be done in a week or two ? That document was already finished when they first puplished it on their site. https://www.iim.org.au/uploads/4/9/6/7/49678653/covid-19_strategic_intelligence_20200330.pdf
Hi Butthuber I have seen the validation data on the PCR test for the SARS2-CoVid-2 virus test, both real time PCR and quantative tests and the USA/UK/French tests are now excellent. The fault in the test is still the sampling method, especially if done at home by yourself Sensitivity and specificity of the test when sample is taken by a trained person (who doesnt mind sticking a swab right to the back of your nose/throat) is >98%. So more random gibberish from you Butthuber
