They need to go to AS and get the consortium’s lawyers to list the questions to put to Musters.
For me off the top of my head.
1. How can the KSA be a director when that does not comply with English Law.
2. What were the assurances given by the SA Court and why were these deemed unacceptable.
3. Why was no decision to refuse made when consortium not willing to name KSA as director.
4. Why was arbitration proposed instead of the PL making a decision
5. What point or points exactly was the arbitration intended to determine
6. Did a meeting or discussion with Bein occur where takeover was discussed. If so, why?
7. Did any meetings or discussions occur with other PL clubs where takeover was discussed. If so, why and with who
8. If any discussions or meetings occurred under 6 and 7 what was discussed.
Not expecting Musters would answer these or wouldn’t claim confidentiality but for me need to be asked. For 6 and 7 and 8 confidentially re the takeover couldn’t apply as not supposed to be part of the test. He could also lie but that would then depend upon what the consortium could prove separately. It would partly be an exercise of pinning down the PL position ready for Court but that is also why I don’t think Musters will actually say anything specific as opposed to general and non commital