All you did is complain all night!Well, on our date he had a rather slutty combination of leather mini and thigh boots on
All you did is complain all night!Well, on our date he had a rather slutty combination of leather mini and thigh boots on
Do you wear floral dresses on a night out ?
I'm hoping Bob will indeed avoid that one!Totally agree, it could also be looked at as a class issue....however the fact cannot be ignored that it is fundamentally an issue within the black community, specifically the young black male community, that gang culture is a massive problem....and the main danger to young black males today (as quoted by Trevor Philips). To ignore the fact is, in my opinion, making the situation worse.
Is that because he is black?
All you did is complain all night!
Very interesting article
I guess the two key questions are:
- does this type of approach have a permanent impact on lowering (knife) crime
- if tried with success in one geographic area, why has it not been used more widely
We undoubtedly need to be flexible in the approaches adopted to tackle crime. The cost to society is horrendous both in human and economic terms
Does anyone know the history of the zero tolerance approach adopted some years ago in NYC?
Assumption only, but going on local knowledge I'd think that once you can wean one generation away from knife crime then subsequent generations will not see the "glamour" behind such lifestyles and would be less likely to follow in this path. Continued work by such parties as VRU are essential though.
As for the geographical question, I think it may be to do with funding. As a devolved nation, the Scottish Government could allocate funds to the VRU without oversight from Westminster.
Someone ask me another!
Yeah - I think we're broadly on the same page. I know it's been linked to a few times on this thread, but have you seen this video?You must log in or register to see media
Doesn't ignore the facts, as you say, but looks at wider societal determinants (beyond race alone) and includes constructive solutions.
Of course not, but you made that point immediately after denying that defunding the police was a BLM policy. You were hedging, in case you were wrong. And as it turned out, you were wrong and the policy was not something I fabricated. I can't see why you just can't come out and admit it. Pride, may be
Short straw wouldnt bother meOur Stacey or Holly Willoughby....?
I would say there are constructive solutions being implemented. The police force of today is far different from the police of the 70,s and 80’s. To say they (the police) are still institutionally racist is again in my opinion, wrong. Anyone who grew up in those years would be a liar if they wouldn’t admit there was a problem with racist, violent police officers......they have now mostly been weeded out and a new generation have been recruited.
Police, as well as prison officers, ambulance staff, magistrates and youth workers are also going into schools to tell kids about the perils and dangers of knife crime at an early age....to show them, and partly to shock them, about what they can expect if they carry a knife.
I truly believe efforts are being made...real efforts.....it just has to continue and the community has to admit to its problems instead of blaming others.
I don't doubt that things are getting better and that some solutions are being implemented. I think institutional racism is still a challenge though - and to be very clear, that is often the structure of the police force itself rather than any individual within that structure. If you look at the arrest rates for drug use and the usage figures you'll see what I mean - BAME Londoners in totality are twice as likely as Caucasian individuals to be arrested for posession of cannabis, despite illict use of cannabis being roughly the same rate between those two populations. (NHS Digital data for the usage). That's not going to be because an individual officer wants to go out and arrest BAME individuals for cannabis, but will be linked to stop and search rates being so much higher in certain populations etc.
On the ‘Cannabis’ issue, a good start would be to legalise it, along with all drugs. Thus creating vast profits for funding of drug education and other projects without having to ‘defund’ the police. It would also free up police time, stop many youths being convicted and acquiring a police record that may effect their whole lives.
It’s a war that can never be won.....until a government is brave enough to admit that we are always gonna lose
Now that's an issue where I definitely do sit on the fence. Completely see both sides, and think there are logical arguments for and against legalisation. Not quite sure what would be the most net beneficial.
you must be fast if you are going to give him a head startI'd take on BOS no problem
With a 95m head start obviously.....
Our Stacey or Holly Willoughby....?
You must log in or register to see imagesYou must log in or register to see images
what was the question again