The Nitty Gritty of the BLM movement

[Smug in Boots]

You didn't avoid him at all, you quoted many of his posts that didn't involve you.

If 1000s of posts, back and fourth with somebody is trying to avoid them, then you must not understand the definition of avoid.

I didn't and, to be honest, you're starting to look as obsessed as he was.

If you feel so strongly, pm a Mod and take it up with them ...

... I don't have to defend myself for being unwilling to be stalked, on two forums, by someone accusing me of being a racist.

 

[Smug in Boots]

Unrelated point but how do you highlight/bold part of a comment you want to reply to?

On a phone stick your thumb on it, expand it and press B at top left.

Similar on a laptop I'd imagine.

 

[Dancingstripes]

I didn't and, to be honest, you're starting to look as obsessed as he was.

If you feel so strongly, pm a Mod and take it up with them ...

... I don't have to defend myself for being unwilling to be stalked, on two forums, by someone accusing me of being a racist.

I could prove you to be lying, and show you many posts that you quoted of his which didn't involve you.

But then I guess you would go on to call me a "stalker", as after 4 posts to you, your already brushing me with your "obsessed" brush.

I have asked the mod to which rules he broke and am waiting for reply.

I didn't agree with hardly any of kittens views and challenged him on them. But to see him banned because he was unpopular among certain posters is not something I agree with.

 

[Sandy Camel]

I could prove you to be lying, and show you many posts that you quoted of his which didn't involve you.

But then I guess you would go on to call me a "stalker", as after 4 posts to you, your already brushing me with your "obsessed" brush.

I have asked the mod to which rules he broke and am waiting for reply.

I didn't agree with hardly any of kittens views and challenged him on them. But to see him banned because he was unpopular among certain posters is not something I agree with.

We get it, you're not happy with the way kittens got banned. If the way the forum is moderated upsets you so much just don't use it.

 

[Smug in Boots]

I could prove you to be lying, and show you many posts that you quoted of his which didn't involve you.

But then I guess you would go on to call me a "stalker", as after 4 posts to you, your already brushing me with your "obsessed" brush.

I have asked the mod to which rules he broke and am waiting for reply.

I didn't agree with hardly any of kittens views and challenged him on them. But to see him banned because he was unpopular among certain posters is not something I agree with.

Go on then, back up your claims that I'm a liar ...

... that's quite an accusation and I'm sure you must have the facts to quickly back it up.

Don't worry about being called a stalker, or whatever else, just do it. I won't accuse you of obsession, stalking, whatever ... promise.

Kittenmittons always avoided having to back up his accusations ....

... I'm sure you're made of sterner stuff.

Rest assured I'll sincerely apologise if you're right.

 

[Smug in Boots]

@Kittenmittons can you explain why 4 out of 5 African countries used white managers at the World Cup?

Did he ever explain?

Or did he do what he always did with me ...

... made outrageous claims than vanish when he didn't have an answer.

 

[Dancingstripes]

Go on then, back up your claims that I'm a liar ...

... that's quite an accusation and I'm sure you must have the facts to quickly back it up.

Don't worry about being called a stalker, or whatever else, just do it. I won't accuse you of obsession, stalking, whatever ... promise.

Kittenmittons always avoided having to back up his accusations ....

... I'm sure you're made of sterner stuff.

Rest assured I'll sincerely apologise if you're right.

This is 1 example. He's commented on the thread with no mention of your name, or gave you any reason to engage with him.

Yet you've gone out of your way to start a conversation with him.

How many examples do you need?

 

[Smug in Boots]

I said I wouldn't reply in this thread. I do have feelings on the matter and would love to reply, but I'm damned if I do, damned if I don't. The same people telling me to give it a rest are the same ones taking the piss that I somehow don't have an answer.

The fact you can't all see this, and a mod joining in and enabling the abuse is ****ing mental.

Hmmm ....

 

[Dancingstripes]

We get it, you're not happy with the way kittens got banned. If the way the forum is moderated upsets you so much just don't use it.

I don't have an issue with any of the mods apart from Gordon.

But I'll leave it there, as I don't want to de rail the thread.

 

[Smug in Boots]

This is 1 example. He's commented on the thread with no mention of your name, or gave you any reason to engage with him.

Yet you've gone out of your way to start a conversation with him.

How many examples do you need?

Why doesn't that involve me, I'm confused.

This is a thread I created about BLM and @Ozzymac has posted about BLM.

Kittenmittons has replied and been totally condescending towards Ozzy as if he's thick.

I've responded with a perfectly polite, on topic post. There's no abuse or personal attack, purely a response with my honest views.

What you don't realise is that, at the same time, Kittenmittons was attacking me on another thread.

I've shown that you asked him about black managers and he flanelled you ...

... now you're throwing up post after post defending him and calling me a liar.

Fair enough, you think I'm a liar, don't bother me again.

 

[Dancingstripes]

Why doesn't that involve me, I'm confused.

This is a thread I created about BLM and @Ozzymac has posted about BLM.

Kittenmittons has replied and been totally condescending towards Ozzy as if he's thick.

I've responded with a perfectly polite, on topic post. There's no abuse or personal attack, purely a response with my honest views.

What you don't realise is that, at the same time, Kittenmittons was attacking me on another thread.

I've shown that you asked him about black managers and he flanelled you ...

... now you're throwing up post after post defending him and calling me a liar.

Fair enough, you think I'm a liar, don't bother me again.

You are lying though.

You said you always done your utmost to avoid him, but you didn't, you actually went out of your way to engage with him.

You asked me to show you examples and I have, and it wouldn't be difficult to find more.

I'm happy to finish with the subject now though.

 

[Smug in Boots]

You are lying though.

You said you always done your utmost to avoid him, but you didn't, you actually went out of your way to engage with him.

You asked me to show you examples and I have, and it wouldn't be difficult to find more.

I'm happy to finish with the subject now though.

You're employing exactly the same grammatical nuances he did, strange.

As I've clearly said he'd returned from a ban and was attacking me on another thread without any good cause.

My post was honest, logical and on subject. He was condescending to @Ozzymac for no good reason.

If that's not good enough tough luck.

I notice you've ignored the argument you had with him, but that's your business.

 

[Dancingstripes]

You're employing exactly the same grammatical nuances he did, strange.

As I've clearly said he'd returned from a ban and was attacking me on another thread without any good cause.

My post was honest, logical and on subject. He was condescending to @Ozzymac for no good reason.

If that's not good enough tough luck.

I notice you've ignored the argument you had with him, but that's your business.

I didn't have an argument with him. I tried to engage with him about a subject and he didn't respond, that's his choice.

And I'm happy to agree to disagree with the other stuff.

 

[Bob Cheval]

It’s like he never left.

 

[Smug in Boots]

I didn't have an argument with him. I tried to engage with him about a subject and he didn't respond, that's his choice.

And I'm happy to agree to disagree with the other stuff.

You've defended someone who wouldn't respond to you and called someone who politely replied a liar ...

... fair enough mate, don't bother replying to me ever again.

 

[Smug in Boots]

It’s like he never left.

Stripey has gone from arguing with KM to defending him ...

... thank Heavens I don't have to meet these weirdos in real life.

 

[Dancingstripes]

You've defended someone who wouldn't respond to you and called someone who politely replied a liar ...

... fair enough mate, don't bother replying to me ever again.

I'm only calling it as I see it. I'm not trying to cause offence to you, and have provided examples to back up what I've said.

I'm happy to leave it there, no fallout wanted from my part.

 

[Dancingstripes]

Stripey has gone from arguing with KM to defending him ...

... thank Heavens I don't have to meet these weirdos in real life.

Ah the insults have started.

 

[Sidthemackem]

Stripey has gone from arguing with KM to defending him ...

... thank Heavens I don't have to meet these weirdos in real life.

Coo-eeeeh!!!

 

[Smug in Boots]

I'm only calling it as I see it. I'm not trying to cause offence to you, and have provided examples to back up what I've said.

I'm happy to leave it there, no fallout wanted from my part.

You wanted fallout and you've got it.

You've backed up someone you derided then turned on me because he was banned.

I didn't ban him and played no part in it, he brought it on himself but you just can't see that.

Just f**k off and don't respond to me ever again ...

... otherwise you'll be guilty of what you've just accused me of.

Clear?