Sounds about right..
You must log in or register to see media
will investigate setting fire to something not belonging to you is arson! arson is a criminal offenceAs far as I'm aware it's not illegal so why would they? Pretty scummy yes but if it's not illegal then what can they do?
OK hahaha ... you didn't answer the question should we wipe you from history because you made 1 mistake?Hahaha what on earth is this.
What good could possibly outweigh owning actual slaves?
inter /or tribal selling of females from early age [ single numbers like 8 ] is quite widespread across Africa [ Asia also] as you say taken as done as part of their social circle.Africa can be in marriages where they are totally subservient - Enslaved. That is a accepted social norm.
BLM's view of that now?
seems to fit in with comment above singular fixationThey wouldn't ever admit that their own people would do that to one another....maybe they would find it acceptable, so long that it doesn't involve white people!.......same as benefiting from products and goods that members of BLM buy on a daily basis made from countries still practicing slavery or illegal enforced child labour..
BCFCRob, I must be honest, you do not seem to be able to comprehend what you are on about, or able to distinguish the credibility of the "helpful answers you get" you often do not believe them [until about 2 or more have tried to be helpful in explaining them ]or you try to turn it into a joke or lighthearted retort. AFRICA ...modern day Africa as CLIFTON says is still rife with the sort of behavior that is currently being the fuel of the unrest ….. not caring about social norms is not the best way to help the world … and it was an accepted way of life for 1000's of years to enslave … a person ..persons... a country … go back 3000 years before AD and CHECK OUT WORLD HISTORY … then when you answer some of the questions / comments you might be able to come up with a sensible approach to a serious sitituationI see, in that case they should be arrested. ...so why make a statement without checking the facts
Not even sure what the point of your post is Cliftonville. What you've referenced is barbaric and wrong. How does that have anything to do with what I've said? A massively tenuous link and a complete and utter waste of time.
I don't care how different social norms are. They will have known that 'owning' slaves was morally wrong in the 1600's and 1700's. Some more slight differences are of course forgivable given the different times. I'm not sure 'owning' slaves counts as slight.
You also need to consider that people in a lot of underdeveloped countries right now, and back here in the 17th and 18th centuries, the people are and were largely uneducated. The vast majority of people couldn't read or write and wouldn't have had a school to go to.
So the power, influence and money aspect between the have's and have nots hasn't changed a jot between now and then, but people do largely understand right from wrong even if they then choose to ignore it now.
OK hahaha ... you didn't answer the question should we wipe you from history because you made 1 mistake?
second part owning slaves … if I had been a slave, and been taken miles from where I called home ..living in fear of the next tribal battle, and possible death, next illness or going hungry because there was no food. I would think having made the journey "and settled in" I would think I was lucky and would have made the best of what I had. You have to remember [ and there were some bad ones ] most "owners" looked after their workers ...health care very limited as it was 17th/ 18th centuries often available. Many were given freedom and some became landowners / farmers ……
.Sounds about right..
You must log in or register to see media
I considered doing exactly the same but refrained for the same reason as you ponderedI nearly posted a comment about the scenes at the Nike store in Oxford Street on Monday. But felt I'd be branded a racist just for pointing out the difference in well ordered queues around the rest of the country.
There - I've said it.
Cue.... RP is a racist.
And now this. Seriously, what is the matter with some people ?????
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-53089528
Not by me mate, I'm probably considered to be racist on here with the belief that Colstons statue should have remained where it was, with a plaque of his history....seems like racist is wrong but vandalism, ignoring social distancing in a pandemic when it suits and deleting Bristol's historic past is fine...I nearly posted a comment about the scenes at the Nike store in Oxford Street on Monday. But felt I'd be branded a racist just for pointing out the difference in well ordered queues around the rest of the country.
There - I've said it.
Cue.... RP is a racist.
same views here … mayor says tit for tat …. bible says eye for an eyeNot by me mate, I'm probably considered to be racist on here with the belief that Colstons statue should have remained where it was, with a plaque of his history....seems like racist is wrong but vandalism, ignoring social distancing in a pandemic when it suits and deleting Bristol's historic past is fine...
that's where a problem lies you spin things using inaccurate contexts to make it into or cover your argument … WHAT I SAID WAS …………….2. You've actually just said that slaves from the 17th/18th centuries were LUCKY to be enslaved. You've actually just said that.
I never said slaves were lucky, had I wished to cover the general population I would have stated " some or most slaves were fortunate" [ I cannot state their luck or or lack of that is an individual thing ] ........ I would think I was lucky and would have made the best of what I had ...
I don't agree with it either and much less when sports people are doing it. I think it's going down a dangerous path and is for appeasement and subjugation purposes only.OK, something else I have to admit.
I'm uncomfortable with the act of 'taking a knee'.
Banged to rights - racist.