Off Topic The Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should the UK remain a part of the EU or leave?

  • Stay in

    Votes: 56 47.9%
  • Get out

    Votes: 61 52.1%

  • Total voters
    117
  • Poll closed .
Sorry to be pedantic Goldie but Nazi Germany had quite a bit of help from local Ukrainians, Latvians, Lithuanians and Poles etc to help murder their Jewish populations.
Not to mention from all the collaborators in the other occupied countries who were only to happy to help if it meant their own countries surviving Nazi occupation.
 
Germany was brought up when its electorate was held up as sophisticated, compared to British thick as mince. It's fair to look at recent history.

Let's get things into scale. Nazi Germany tortured and murdered 6 million innocent Jewish civilians alone.

India became independent in 1947. Bloody Sunday was tragic for the 13 protesters that were killed - In 1972 alone, the IRA killed 100 British soldiers. The Boer Camps should never have been created but British soldiers were dying of disease at the same rate as the Boer families. The Mau Mau were about as savage as any terrorist organisation could be, and against their own people.

****ing hell you are looking through history with amazingly Union Jack tinted spectacles and have been reading different history records to the rest of the world. The uk was massively culpable for suffering in the partition of India. You seem to want to absorb any blame from the uks action for anything let’s just say as history goes the uk has about the worst for all levels of atrocities.

However should that be forgotten? No, should it reflect on the electorate today? Of course not. Do the sins of the father cast a shadow on the son? No, otherwise people would hold the West’s kids as tormentors rather than victims.

sophistication is a very subjective word, if you look at education, child poverty, crime rates, rehabilitation as factors. Watford might well have a point.
 
****ing hell you are looking through history with amazingly Union Jack tinted spectacles and have been reading different history records to the rest of the world. The uk was massively culpable for suffering in the partition of India. You seem to want to absorb any blame from the uks action for anything let’s just say as history goes the uk has about the worst for all levels of atrocities.

However should that be forgotten? No, should it reflect on the electorate today? Of course not. Do the sins of the father cast a shadow on the son? No, otherwise people would hold the West’s kids as tormentors rather than victims.

sophistication is a very subjective word, if you look at education, child poverty, crime rates, rehabilitation as factors. Watford might well have a point.

My point was really just that this country is full of utter mongs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiwiqpr and bobmid
****ing hell you are looking through history with amazingly Union Jack tinted spectacles and have been reading different history records to the rest of the world. The uk was massively culpable for suffering in the partition of India. You seem to want to absorb any blame from the uks action for anything let’s just say as history goes the uk has about the worst for all levels of atrocities.

However should that be forgotten? No, should it reflect on the electorate today? Of course not. Do the sins of the father cast a shadow on the son? No, otherwise people would hold the West’s kids as tormentors rather than victims.

sophistication is a very subjective word, if you look at education, child poverty, crime rates, rehabilitation as factors. Watford might well have a point.

It may have been ineptly done by the British but both Muslims and Hindus were pressing for separation. And they were the ones killing each other. Not the British.

Six million Jews dead in 5 years. Give me a figure for British atrocities over 5 consecutive years.
 
Not to mention from all the collaborators in the other occupied countries who were only to happy to help if it meant their own countries surviving Nazi occupation.

True but it was mainly in the Eastern occupied countries that the willing participation in mass murder and torture took place.
Making no excuse for others of course.
 
****ing hell you are looking through history with amazingly Union Jack tinted spectacles and have been reading different history records to the rest of the world. The uk was massively culpable for suffering in the partition of India. You seem to want to absorb any blame from the uks action for anything let’s just say as history goes the uk has about the worst for all levels of atrocities.

However should that be forgotten? No, should it reflect on the electorate today? Of course not. Do the sins of the father cast a shadow on the son? No, otherwise people would hold the West’s kids as tormentors rather than victims.

sophistication is a very subjective word, if you look at education, child poverty, crime rates, rehabilitation as factors. Watford might well have a point.

To play the devils advocate Wills, whilst the British at the time were happy for the different communities to destroy each other.....it was the communities themselves that did the killing.

Sometimes, respectfully, you come over as not liking this country very much....which is a shame ‘cos we do have a lot to be very proud of as a nation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiwiqpr and QPR999
It may have been ineptly done by the British but both Muslims and Hindus were pressing for separation. And they were the ones killing each other. Not the British.

Six million Jews dead in 5 years. Give me a figure for British atrocities over 5 consecutive years.


That is amazingly specific, in a suits your specific requirements. This fella recons the following “…Nor is there any memorial to the massacres of the Raj, from Delhi in 1857 to Amritsar in 1919, the deaths of 35 million Indians in totally unnecessary famines caused by British policy,”

Not saying he is 100% right but he definitely has a very valid point.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...n-shashi-tharoor-british-empire-a7627041.html

You also don't seem to have addressed why the generations of today are responsible for those of their forefathers? Should the Wests kids be locked up? Should all English fans be banned for the actions of English football holligans?
 
It may have been ineptly done by the British but both Muslims and Hindus were pressing for separation. And they were the ones killing each other. Not the British.

Six million Jews dead in 5 years. Give me a figure for British atrocities over 5 consecutive years.

Are we getting into the comparison of atrocities now ? :)
 
That is amazingly specific, in a suits your specific requirements. This fella recons the following “…Nor is there any memorial to the massacres of the Raj, from Delhi in 1857 to Amritsar in 1919, the deaths of 35 million Indians in totally unnecessary famines caused by British policy,”

Not saying he is 100% right but he definitely has a very valid point.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...n-shashi-tharoor-british-empire-a7627041.html

You also don't seem to have addressed why the generations of today are responsible for those of their forefathers? Should the Wests kids be locked up? Should all English fans be banned for the actions of English football holligans?

I don’t get your point Wills ? Are you saying we should have memorials up here for past massacres attributed to the British Empire ? If that’s what you mean then it’s a rather bizarre thing to say.......
 
To play the devils advocate Wills, whilst the British at the time were happy for the different communities to destroy each other.....it was the communities themselves that did the killing.

Sometimes, respectfully, you come over as not liking this country very much....which is a shame ‘cos we do have a lot to be very proud of as a nation.

I consider myself lucky to be have born into this Nation, I absolutely appreciate the sacrifices of others that allow me to live the life I have today, but if you have pride in the good that has been done you can't be selective and have to take on board the **** that has been carried out and the National shames, less not we forget the slave trade for starters
 
I consider myself lucky to be have born into this Nation, I absolutely appreciate the sacrifices of others that allow me to live the life I have today, but if you have pride in the good that has been done you can't be selective and have to take on board the **** that has been carried out and the National shames, less not we forget the slave trade for starters


Not at all what I'm getting at but you can't just have a go at the Germans and ignore what has been done by the Brits
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD
I consider myself lucky to be have born into this Nation, I absolutely appreciate the sacrifices of others that allow me to live the life I have today, but if you have pride in the good that has been done you can't be selective and have to take on board the **** that has been carried out and the National shames, less not we forget the slave trade for starters

Why should I be ashamed at what our ancestors have done ? How far does this shame go back ? Should the Italians be ashamed for what they did in Abyssinia ? The French for what they did in Spain ? The Turks for what their ancestors did throughout Europe.....The English for the Crusades ?
Where does a nations shame end ?
 
Why should I be ashamed at what our ancestors have done ? How far does this shame go back ? Should the Italians be ashamed for what they did in Abyssinia ? The French for what they did in Spain ? The Turks for what their ancestors did throughout Europe.....The English for the Crusades ?
Where does a nations shame end ?

About 1930s apparently
 
I consider myself lucky to be have born into this Nation, I absolutely appreciate the sacrifices of others that allow me to live the life I have today, but if you have pride in the good that has been done you can't be selective and have to take on board the **** that has been carried out and the National shames, less not we forget the slave trade for starters
Let’s not get started on the slave trade Wills......we were far from innocent and it was horrendous but let’s not forget who sold us the slaves in the first place......
 
Let’s not get started on the slave trade Wills......we were far from innocent and it was horrendous but let’s not forget who sold us the slaves in the first place......

Yes but as you stated in your previous post and what I was getting at is why should the actions of the forefathers till be held over the people of today? Like seems to be the case of the German people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Staines R's
That is amazingly specific, in a suits your specific requirements. This fella recons the following “…Nor is there any memorial to the massacres of the Raj, from Delhi in 1857 to Amritsar in 1919, the deaths of 35 million Indians in totally unnecessary famines caused by British policy,”

Not saying he is 100% right but he definitely has a very valid point.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...n-shashi-tharoor-british-empire-a7627041.html

You also don't seem to have addressed why the generations of today are responsible for those of their forefathers? Should the Wests kids be locked up? Should all English fans be banned for the actions of English football holligans?

I'm not talking about responsibility. I'm talking about intelligence, the genetic side anyway. Watford has it that much of the UK electorate is thick as mince ie low intelligence. And he held out Germany as being of greater sophistication. Yet many of their grand or great grandparents voted in Hitler. The UK electorate rejected Mosley. So I'm saying the UK electorate has greater genetic intelligence than Watford gives credit for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ELLERS
Yes but as you stated in your previous post and what I was getting at is why should the actions of the forefathers till be held over the people of today? Like seems to be the case of the German people.

Agreed. There were many German anti fascists/Communists and Leftists whom hated the Nazis just as much as us.
Maybe we’re making the same point here......and no nation (including ours) should be held accountable and ashamed for the actions of their forefathers.

I always found it outrageous and bizarre that the vast majority of Turks can rewrite history and totally deny the appalling things that they did to the Armenians. It led to many rows between me and an ex of mine (who was Turkish) as she categorically denied that any atrocities had ever happened. It was all rather disturbing.