Where have I persevered with care homes being wrongly attributed to CV? That’s not the point I’m making.
In the post I quoted, mate, amongst others.
Where have I persevered with care homes being wrongly attributed to CV? That’s not the point I’m making.
Overall minus a 5 year average !Overall deaths or care home deaths?
I said that deaths were going down as Coronavirus when that might not have been the main cause of death. I never said that was specific to care homes.In the post I quoted, mate, amongst others.
And if it's not what you expect will it be lies?I was thinking along those lines whilst on my bike earlier
The figures will all be different this year. I’d imagine RTA deaths will be way down and suicide will probably go up quite a bit. Not so sure it will be that easy.Overall minus a 5 year average !
We haven't had any large flu deaths this year so the figures would be pretty sedimentary
Subtracting the excess deaths from a five year average would be a nearer figure than expelling care home deaths .And if it's not what you expect will it be lies?
Without looking at the stats, what If say the last 3 year deaths have spiked or rapidly declined. That will probably need to be taken more into consideration that just an average.Subtracting the excess deaths from a five year average would be a nearer figure than expelling care home deaths .
There seems to be some ****ing idiots still driving like idiots !The figures will all be different this year. I’d imagine RTA deaths will be way down and suicide will probably go up quite a bit. Not so sure it will be that easy.
Subtracting the excess deaths from a five year average would be a nearer figure than expelling care home deaths .
I agree, which is why you never see me speculating on figures being hidden or massaged.Subtracting the excess deaths from a five year average would be a nearer figure than expelling care home deaths .
He’d have a different attitude if it had been the Jimmy Saville protector in ICU.I agree, which is why you never see me speculating on figures being hidden or massaged.
Because i have no idea of the truth i will wait until actual final figures are produced.
So publishing correct deaths from Covid 19 would be a better way of not having this confusion ?That sounds pretty standard. People will put off seeing a GP for something they would have done a couple of months ago that will become serious. I’m guessing it’s had an impact on chemo. People who have a heart attack won’t quite get an ambulance in time. Loads of secondary deaths that aren’t CV will push the death rate up and a few things will help push it down too.
You could take a median figure instead if that would help.
So publishing correct deaths from Covid 19 would be a better way of not having this confusion ?
100% honesty so we can learn for a second wave ???
That's where the whole thing gets ****ed up. It's very hard to attribute death to COVID19 if the person who died was already one step from it with another ailment.So publishing correct deaths from Covid 19 would be a better way of not having this confusion ?
100% honesty so we can learn for a second wave ???
True but imo if ever there was a time to learn from mistakes it's now.I agree but then I’m not trying to defend anyone who might need defending.
We may not get a true figure but after the event hopefully we can get somewhere near !That's where the whole thing gets ****ed up. It's very hard to attribute death to COVID19 if the person who died was already one step from it with another ailment.
So publishing correct deaths from Covid 19 would be a better way of not having this confusion ?
100% honesty so we can learn for a second wave ???
Like you said earlier, the closest gauge will be an average comparison with previous years.We may not get a true figure but after the event hopefully we can get somewhere near !
Like you said earlier, the closest gauge will be an average comparison with previous years.