As we are asking ridiculous questions should we send food and support to a country experiencing famine?
If we didn't send food people would die until there was population equilibrium with enough food to feed everyone who had survived.
That would have be seen as a "good outcome" by some because a great deal of money would have been saved, which some consider to be very important, and there probably wouldn't be a famine in again.
A shame about the poor sods that died but that is the consequence of living in a world that is driven by the greed of the very rich few.
If we didn't send food people would die until there was population equilibrium with enough food to feed everyone who had survived.
That would have be seen as a "good outcome" by some because a great deal of money would have been saved, which some consider to be very important, and there probably wouldn't be a famine in again.
A shame about the poor sods that died but that is the consequence of living in a world that is driven by the greed of the very rich few.