I've asked a number of Tory voters why they are going to vote Conservative. Most of them just told me what they don't like about Corbyn, they don't seem to be able to tell me what they actually want from their party or what's good about it.
I'm not really educated in it AR. I was just asking the question. I suppose I was asking do the likes of Amazon etc, constitute being part of the 5% or is it to come form personal taxation of the higher earners and not business.Most people can’t just up and leave though can they? Job, family, home? That stands for people earning 80k or 100k as much as anyone.
If the top 5% of tax payers will pay for the proposed Labour spending, two questions, what proportion of overall tax do that 5% contribute to all tax revenue and second, how long before that 5% leave the UK therefore increasing the burden of committed spending to other people...?
If the top 5% of tax payers will pay for the proposed Labour spending, two questions, what proportion of overall tax do that 5% contribute to all tax revenue and second, how long before that 5% leave the UK therefore increasing the burden of committed spending to other people...?
Ok.
But what else?
There must be more to it than that? Unless you're super healthy and are well above the poverty line.
What about the fact that the majority of the cabinet, including Johnson, have in the past repeatedly voted down withdrawal agreements that would've seen us leave the EU?
It's exactly as you describe it ' The majority of the cabinet'.I mean the first vote was the biggest defeat in history(432-202)for a U.K government.Obviously Johnson wasn't alone in thinking that the deal was duff.Subsequently,2 other votes went against Teresa Mays deal?What about the fact that the majority of the cabinet, including Johnson, have in the past repeatedly voted down withdrawal agreements that would've seen us leave the EU?
I've asked a number of Tory voters why they are going to vote Conservative. Most of them just told me what they don't like about Corbyn, they don't seem to be able to tell me what they actually want from their party or what's good about it.
2. . He was there as a backbench MP
Listen to what he says & not what the MSM tell you he says.
Yet Johnsons deal is by all account worse than May's. So what is so enticing about Johnsons deal now?It's exactly as you describe it ' The majority of the cabinet'.I mean the first vote was the biggest defeat in history(432-202)for a U.K government.Obviously Johnson wasn't alone in thinking that the deal was duff.Subsequently,2 other votes went against Teresa Mays deal?
Most people can’t just up and leave though can they? Job, family, home? That stands for people earning 80k or 100k as much as anyone.
Those were just the worst hit ones, all nations that use the dollar as a reserve currency were affected by the crash. It was a global recession, it wasn't just us.
That's just so wrong on so many levels Steven.I have absolutely no problem with people earning in excess of £81k,in the vast majority of cases they've earned the right to that kind of salary.For example hospital consultants/dentists etc put themselves through years of financial hardship to attain the relative qualifications,so why should they be penalised in taxes? As for your Tarquin/Bransholme comment? This isn't class warfare and isn't really necessary!!But why would they suddenly just leave?
It's a lot easier said than done. Even after the tax increase, they'll still take home a lot more than most people. I guess little Tarquin won't be going on that third cruise. I'm sure the single parents living on Bransholme are heartbroken for him.
For the sake of balance, it needs to be said that Labour have an appreciable number of tribal voters who similarly don't like posh people or 'privileged ' people, a sort of inverted snobbery and subtle brainwashing.
In fact, the Labour Party regularly uses this divisive rhetoric to corral voters back into their pen
That's just so wrong on so many levels Steven.I have absolutely no problem with people earning in excess of £81k,in the vast majority of cases they've earned the right to that kind of salary.For example hospital consultants/dentists etc put themselves through years of financial hardship to attain the relative qualifications,so why should they be penalised in taxes? As for your Tarquin/Bransholme comment? This isn't class warfare and isn't really necessary!!
You've got your views, fair enough. I've got mine
2. I couldn't care less if he was a pantomime dame at the time. If I was invited to say a 'witch burning' event. I'd want to know what I was attending, perhaps when JC went to Tunis he should have asked what was going on. I don't buy the explanation.
JC is the kind of person who would support every team playing England....He'd rather shout for our opponents because he hates patronism and turns his nose up at such displays of sentiment because he sees them as nationalist.
As I've said Labour have some good policies and good people. Sadly JC's the leader. Perhaps he'll get the Arsenal job.
And, as I said, were other comparable countries as adversely affected?
You've got your views, fair enough. I've got mine
2. I couldn't care less if he was a pantomime dame at the time. If I was invited to say a 'witch burning' event. I'd want to know what I was attending, perhaps when JC went to Tunis he should have asked what was going on. I don't buy the explanation.
JC is the kind of person who would support every team playing England....He'd rather shout for our opponents because he hates patronism and turns his nose up at such displays of sentiment because he sees them as nationalist.
As I've said Labour have some good policies and good people. Sadly JC's the leader. Perhaps he'll get the Arsenal job.
If the top 5% of tax payers will pay for the proposed Labour spending, two questions, what proportion of overall tax do that 5% contribute to all tax revenue and second, how long before that 5% leave the UK therefore increasing the burden of committed spending to other people...?
He knew the event he was attending. I told you what it was. It was the MSM who altered the facts.Do you feel the same way about the others who attended?
He’s more patriotic than all the other Party Leaders. His idea of patriotism is just different to theirs.
Theirs is about flying a flag & singing Rule Britannia whilst selling everything that is British off to the highest foreign bidder at the expense of the poorest & most vulnerable in society.
His is about protecting British assets whilst making sure the poorest & most vulnerable are not left behind & are able to fulfil their potential with the support they need.
Saying you won’t vote Labour because of JC is like saying you won’t have an operation because you don’t like the Doctor.
Voting Conservative because you don’t like JC is like putting dog **** on your pizza because you don’t like pineapple.
Me? I’m quite comfortable & don’t need for much. I’ll be thinking of the most vulnerable people I see on a daily basis & voting for the Party I believe has their best interest at heart & will do what’s best for them.