Serious takeover talk

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
MackemX said:
Could the so called Sun exclusive not be something along the lines that Donald has agreed to pay Short money if the club went back up within a certain period? It's amazing that Short walked away selling the club for next losing millions wiping off the debt yet whoever came in (Donald) could potentially get promoted within a few seasons to the Premier League and get huge millions in return by selling the club that will be worth far more?

That would mean it's not Donald wanting the 'bonus' money so he's right by denying it but it still exists as a clause somewhere?
Click to expand...

Could be onto something there like and as another poster (may have even been you) said the amount of increase from getting promoted wouldn't cover those bonuses if they did exist.

Love your AV mind if they changed the actual badge to that I'd approve.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MackemX
Pugwash said:
Ahem, Ive always thought it was still on too, still do.
Click to expand...

I'm sure that's the case mate.

However you may not have been subjected to a month of relentless abuse, texts to your mobile, threats of legal action and vile pm's.

People have accused me of doing all this for fun ...

... I can tell you straight mate, it's a long way from being funny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pirate, Dorset, The Dude and 4 others
Smug in Boots said:
Out of all the fantastical theories that sounds sadly realistic.

I know what I was told and who from mate ....

... then I start getting 'libel warnings' from Hotlips and weird text messages to my mobile.

Summats not right.
Click to expand...

I have not mentioned libel in any post or private message to you.

Once again you are intentionally misleading readers of this board.

As an aside Nixon knows even less than you.
 
Hotlips said:
I have not mentioned libel in any post or private message to you.

Once again you are intentionally misleading readers of this board.

As an aside Nixon knows even less than you.
Click to expand...
Once again misleading readers...
What a crock!
Someone else jealous of smug.
Pitiable really
 
Hotlips said:
I have not mentioned libel in any post or private message to you.

Once again you are intentionally misleading readers of this board.

As an aside Nixon knows even less than you.
Click to expand...

You're Pancho, you sad little freak, I knew from the start. You think you're a clever man but you're only fooling yourself.

You deleted the mention of libel in your first post when I pulled you on it.

You repeatedly told me, in RTG pm's, that you didn't have a grudge and banned me for good reason.

This shyte proves what a liar you are.

You're a sad little man who feels powerful because he can ban people from a forum.

You're absolutely nothing, on here, so clear off back from where you came and tell Roger you failed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septem, Pirate, My Left Foot and 16 others
Smug in Boots said:
You're Pancho, you sad little freak, I knew from the start. You think you're a clever man but you're only fooling yourself.

You deleted the mention of libel in your first post when I pulled you on it.

You repeatedly told me, in RTG pm's, that you didn't have a grudge and banned me for good reason.

You're a sad little man who feels powerful because he can ban people from a forum.

You're absolutely nothing, on here, so clear off back from where you came and tell Roger you failed.
Click to expand...
Now that is what I call an articulate rebuke.
Well played
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pirate and Whittylad
Takeover thread took a bit of a turn undercover RTG mods and that :emoticon-0140-rofl:

Suppose nothing else going on at the moment.. I'm trying to just ignore it and whatever happens happens but still can't help checking online for news even though probably will be none anyway.

Start new contract Wednesday so needs to hurry up!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pirate, My Left Foot, Blond Bombshell and 2 others
Smug in Boots said:
You're Pancho, you sad little freak, I knew from the start. You think you're a clever man but you're only fooling yourself.

You deleted the mention of libel in your first post when I pulled you on it.

You repeatedly told me, in RTG pm's, that you didn't have a grudge and banned me for good reason.

This shyte proves what a liar you are.

You're a sad little man who feels powerful because he can ban people from a forum.

You're absolutely nothing, on here, so clear off back from where you came and tell Roger you failed.
Click to expand...
Aye he's deffo got an agenda, quite sad and pathetic that people hide behind names and avatars to have a pop, a good indicator of character IMHO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pirate, marcusblackcat and BigPete
Papa Smurf
Winger
1 minute ago
So after posting some ITK information related to the takeover 3 weeks ago I received a ban for reasons unbeknown to me. I have watched from afar the goings on over the past few weeks with a great deal of frustration seeing the arguing and name calling on the board, and more importantly the information being posted and communicated to the fans through the media regards takeovers and sackings whilst knowing what is actually going on behind the scenes. For fear of once again being banned from the board not for fear of being sued for libel (I would be more than happy to say what I have to say to SD’s face) I will not be posting what I know on a public thread but will be more than happy to share via PM what I know with the more reliable SMB members especially the ones I have revealed my ITK source to previously. Suffice to say I am disgusted by the actions and behaviour of certain people running our club and ashamed that these people represent Sunderland Football club. And for those on here calling the article in the Sun a load of rubbish Alan Nixon is actually very well informed about what has been going on Regards the takeover so make of that what you will.



Above just been posted on RTG
 
BigPete said:
Papa Smurf
Winger
1 minute ago
So after posting some ITK information related to the takeover 3 weeks ago I received a ban for reasons unbeknown to me. I have watched from afar the goings on over the past few weeks with a great deal of frustration seeing the arguing and name calling on the board, and more importantly the information being posted and communicated to the fans through the media regards takeovers and sackings whilst knowing what is actually going on behind the scenes. For fear of once again being banned from the board not for fear of being sued for libel (I would be more than happy to say what I have to say to SD’s face) I will not be posting what I know on a public thread but will be more than happy to share via PM what I know with the more reliable SMB members especially the ones I have revealed my ITK source to previously. Suffice to say I am disgusted by the actions and behaviour of certain people running our club and ashamed that these people represent Sunderland Football club. And for those on here calling the article in the Sun a load of rubbish Alan Nixon is actually very well informed about what has been going on Regards the takeover so make of that what you will.



Above just been posted on RTG
Click to expand...
Well let them believe Alan Nixon
Cause I don’t
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gil T Azell, flandersmackem and BigPete
Brainman said:
So someone over there has posted the awful truth about our owners.
But will only give details to those he trusts by pm.
Anyone?
Click to expand...

Plus he said he's not arsed if he gets banned again... if that was the case you would just post whatever you knew.

Attention seeking IMO :emoticon-0127-lipss
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smug in Boots
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back