I’m not saying everything Smug posts is fact - I have no idea (not saying he’s making it up either) - but it appears you take the statements of two people who are essentially capitalist investors with a lot to lose /gain financially, who happen to be our owners, as fact. Don’t you think alternative news sources are sometimes useful and interesting and offer a different perspective?
In some cases I would agree but in this particular case I know for a fact that unsubstantiated rumours across social media were driving the club to distraction during a very difficult time.
I understand that they were particularly concerned about statements that the deal was done when in fact it was never done and discussions were still very delicate.
The only reason I posted on here in the first place was as a concerned fan of the club and I could see what was happening.
It's pretty clear from the club's statement that my concerns were accurate.
