I really, genuinely cannot work out how Charnley and Ashley are allowed to say nothing on the subject, or how their combined brain works on it. I really, honestly can't - it makes no sense, at all. Not even the 'patsy' line makes any sense; surely anyone has their ideas, nobodys turning up to say "I'll do whatever you tell me, just gizza job", not even Bruce. These people don't know each other, he has to talk about the plans and how he intends to get the club to survive under whatever restraints, right? He had to have some kind of plan, no matter how half-baked, that was effectively agreed with and adhered to by Lee Charnley and Michael Ashley, so what is it? Why aren't we allowed to know?
The Chron published a list of 12 stats from Wyscout that basically showed NUFC , Bruce and the "scouting" to be a shambles.
- Why Steve Bruce given his record?
- Why stand by him, when it's clear he's simply living up to exceptionally low expectations?
- Why this scouting model, when it failed so badly in the past (bar ONE season)?
- Why inaction when relegation looks so certain?
- What they think about so many parallels drawn with the McLaren, and latterly Carver, reign?
- Why they're playing such a risky game when there's more at stake than ever (overdraft against future earnings)?
- Why there's no attempt to sell the club?
- Subsequently what, exactly, does Michael Ashley own this club for?
- What is Lee Charnley's goals and expectations for this football club?
I am not a journalist, but I do not understand in the slightest how the owner and MD (i.e., the entire board) can avoid accountability for the mess they continually create. Is there no legal recourse? Is there not something more that can be said about the degradation of the area, or other outside factors?
Does anybody at all know how they get away with it, and what can be done about it? The only 'solution' I can see is for a group to literally go and seek investment themselves. But what experience does anyone have of that?
The Chron published a list of 12 stats from Wyscout that basically showed NUFC , Bruce and the "scouting" to be a shambles.
- Why Steve Bruce given his record?
- Why stand by him, when it's clear he's simply living up to exceptionally low expectations?
- Why this scouting model, when it failed so badly in the past (bar ONE season)?
- Why inaction when relegation looks so certain?
- What they think about so many parallels drawn with the McLaren, and latterly Carver, reign?
- Why they're playing such a risky game when there's more at stake than ever (overdraft against future earnings)?
- Why there's no attempt to sell the club?
- Subsequently what, exactly, does Michael Ashley own this club for?
- What is Lee Charnley's goals and expectations for this football club?
I am not a journalist, but I do not understand in the slightest how the owner and MD (i.e., the entire board) can avoid accountability for the mess they continually create. Is there no legal recourse? Is there not something more that can be said about the degradation of the area, or other outside factors?
Does anybody at all know how they get away with it, and what can be done about it? The only 'solution' I can see is for a group to literally go and seek investment themselves. But what experience does anyone have of that?
