QPR fan in peace

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
J

John Burke

New Member
Jul 27, 2019
3
3
3
29
Hi guys,

QPR fan here, just signed up to find out a bit about Pugh and Kane, are they decent signings? Heard good things about Pugh not so much Kane.

Good luck for the season
 
Both good players,wish we could have signed them!,but i don't blame anyone for not wanting to be here with the two clowns we have "running" OUR club
 
John Burke said:
Hi guys,

QPR fan here, just signed up to find out a bit about Pugh and Kane, are they decent signings? Heard good things about Pugh not so much Kane.

Good luck for the season
Click to expand...
I think most people would have loved for Pugh to come back but not many would say the same for Kane, which I think says it all.
 
Pugh was ok for us, good team player with plenty of experience as senior pro.

Personally I thought Kane was mostly dog tod last season. He thinks he's better than his ability would suggest. He came to us after a loan at Oxford United and you could tell.
 
FLG said:
Pugh was ok for us, good team player with plenty of experience as senior pro.

Personally I thought Kane was mostly dog tod last season. He thinks he's better than his ability would suggest. He came to us after a loan at Oxford United and you could tell.
Click to expand...
What does Kane bring to the party? As for Pugh, great professional, can help the kids progress, great role model brings great experience to share, creates and scores goals......oh hell!!!
 
Odd. I'd have taken Kane back, even more so given our dire need for FBs. Wouldnt have taken Pugh - he put in a couple of decent performances early on, 1 in particular he looked a world beater, rest of time he was poor, absent, ineffective. And now a season older. Kane will be a decent long term addition to your squad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tigers1970
Gone Fishing said:
Odd. I'd have taken Kane back, even more so given our dire need for FBs. Wouldnt have taken Pugh - he put in a couple of decent performances early on, 1 in particular he looked a world beater, rest of time he was poor, absent, ineffective. And now a season older. Kane will be a decent long term addition to your squad.
Click to expand...

You must have watched a different Pugh to me. :emoticon-0112-wonde
 
John Burke said:
Hi guys,

QPR fan here, just signed up to find out a bit about Pugh and Kane, are they decent signings? Heard good things about Pugh not so much Kane.

Good luck for the season
Click to expand...
You've heard about right.....Pugh v handy behind the striker, Kane, I mean he's alright, not that out of place in the championship but not going to pull up any trees.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PLT
Kane I thought potentially more effective on the right wing than full back. He wasn’t a very good defender and being small was easily bullied and not great in aerial situations.

I liked Pugh, good work ethic with an eye for goal. I'm with DBT in the opinion that he did go missing on occasion. But when on song dynamic and a goal threat.
 
GLP said:
Kane I thought potentially more effective on the right wing than full back. He wasn’t a very good defender and being small was easily bullied and not great in aerial situations.

I liked Pugh, good work ethic with an eye for goal. I'm with DBT in the opinion that he did go missing on occasion. But when on song dynamic and a goal threat.
Click to expand...
Perfect summing up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back