Re the new lad.... Dicko was always reported as playing better off a big target man.... seems he may get chance to show that...
Re the new lad.... Dicko was always reported as playing better off a big target man.... seems he may get chance to show that...
Not sure he will as Terry plays 4-3-3. So it’ll be one centre forward with a winger either side.
Unless they can convert Dicko to play like a winger? May not be a bad idea as he is pretty quick.
An interest is shown in a player obviously but no offer is made until the player passes a through medical. The club have come unstuck too many times by skirting around this. It may have been the case up to quite recently but I can assure you the medical comes first these days. If they don't pass that then no offer is made.Our policy now is a thorough medical before discussing terms? The only club In Britain to do so. I don't wanna stretch this argument out cos I don't know no where near as much as you but in this case I am right..for once..
And despite some of my posts I do respect the knowledge you bring to this forum but when I'm right I'm right(it's not often)
Always thought in a system where don't play 2 central strikers Dicko's best position could be out wide. Can't see him as a single central striker unless refinds whatever he had at Wolves one season.Not sure he will as Terry plays 4-3-3. So it’ll be one centre forward with a winger either side.
Unless they can convert Dicko to play like a winger? May not be a bad idea as he is pretty quick.
Not released. Refused to sign a new contract.It shows how far we’ve fallen when we’re getting excited about a striker released from a mid table league one team.
FFS. How naïve are you ?
So we sign a player up, probably giving him a two or three year contract......then give him a medical and find out he's carrying a long term injury ?
Maybe happened with Jimmy Bullard when every man and his dog jumped down the clubs throat for doing it and maybe happened when we signed Angus MacDonald, and look where that got us. But things have changed. Perhaps the club should have consulted you, Kempton and OLM first but the policy now is, a through medical, then discuss terms. If they fail the medical what's the point in discussing terms ?
FFS. How naïve are you ?
So we sign a player up, probably giving him a two or three year contract......then give him a medical and find out he's carrying a long term injury ?
Maybe happened with Jimmy Bullard when every man and his dog jumped down the clubs throat for doing it and maybe happened when we signed Angus MacDonald, and look where that got us. But things have changed. Perhaps the club should have consulted you, Kempton and OLM first but the policy now is, a through medical, then discuss terms. If they fail the medical what's the point in discussing terms ?



This next year and a year we can activate, so two years...How long does Bowen have left on his contract? Is it one year? If it is I don’t why people think he’s staying? It’s even more reasoning for him to leave?
Re the new lad.... Dicko was always reported as playing better off a big target man.... seems he may get chance to show that...
Two, three, four, or twenty five years contracts, it doesn't matter, the point was a medical has to be passed before anyone is signed on any contract, no matter what length it is.Take it from me its a 3 year contract FACT.
Surprised you didn't know that, its on the clubs social media site thing.
I'm not sure why you're struggling so much with the concept unless you're just fishing for a bite? Player agrees terms, player passes medical, player signs. What so difficult about that?You really are clutching at straws to prove your point. Two, three, four, or twenty five years contracts, it doesn't matter, the point was a medical has to be passed before anyone is signed on any contract, no matter what length it is.
For the record I do not follow the clubs social media site.