Your house would probably have been safer leaving your pass in the house Dennis...I just wanted him to look after it in case my house was burgled
Your house would probably have been safer leaving your pass in the house Dennis...I just wanted him to look after it in case my house was burgled
Members Vote On Concessions
BY RUSSELL ANSON ON MAY 10, 2019HCST NEWS
The trust welcomes the opportunity for fans to have a vote on the return of ticket concessions or family bundles. However, there are questions and observations that we wish the club to respond to.
1 . We are very disappointed that lapsed members, the fans whom the Vice Chair indicates he wishes to build bridges with, are excluded from the voting process. This would be the equivalent of Tesco asking regular shoppers how to entice back shoppers who have taken their custom elsewhere. How can fans be asked to decide for others ?
2. Option B returns prices to the 2010/11 model. However, Disabled fans are excluded. Whilst the club are citing a, ‘level playing field’ as their arbitrary guidance some of our disabled members and fans are indicating vociferously they do not represent them. It cannot be the 2010/11 model if it does not include disabled fans as concessions. We would also wish for clarification on the age for Senior Citizen concessions.
3. Option B states that home fans in the North stand will be relocated. There is no explanation provided for this and it seems a divisive move. We therefore call upon the club to give the reasons behind this or remove it from the scenario.
4. Reference is made to the Upper West Stand. What will be the criteria for this to re-opened and will all maintenance work be carried out prior to re-opening.
5. Members of the founders 500 club, who are long standing supporters seated in w5 west stand had Senior Citizen concessions taken away and were made to pay corporate prices. Will the club be reverting to the situation as of 2010/11 in Option B
6. The Department of Digital Culture Media & Sport, DCMS have guidance rules on meaningful dialogue to football clubs. Clubs performance on this is monitored by The PL and EFL. Hull City partly meet these guidelines through their Supporters Committee.
HCST are not aware the latest poll on Concessions was discussed at the recent SC meeting. How can that be right?
7. We would like clarification on how the vote process will be transparent.
- How are votes collected?
- Who is monitoring the process to ensure impartiality?
- Will the votes be fully published?
- Will the club appoint an independent scrutiny officer?
Match card holder can voteAnyone know if match card holders are eligible to vote?
Im assuming not?
DependsIs the North stand not available next season?
Is the North stand not available next season?
sounds very much like 'fer ark' that many on here long for, only it couldn't be because you couldn't get a beer, warm or otherwise at BP.Maintenance...
The toilets should smell so bad you spend the rest of your life in therapy.
When the ball is hoofed by your teams best striker and lands on the roof, you should be showered in rust.
The stands you stand in should be crumbling away and very dangerous.
The pies must be months out of date and be at least five quid a pop, if available at all.
The beer should be warm and not taste of beer. Never under any circumstances should the pipes be cleaned.
The pitch should be the envy of the footballing world.
Etc...
Depends
Option A yes
Option B no
sounds very much like 'fer ark' that many on here long for, only it couldn't be because you couldn't get a beer, warm or otherwise at BP.

I had a quick glance at the options when it was first published and thought I must have made a mistake. They are bigger ****s than I thought they were. And I did think they were 'ginormous' ****s before this offering.
You do understand why he hasn’t down with supporters groups really though don’t you...According to Ehab Option B is on the ballot because it existed before they took over and isn't an option that has anything to do with the family.
If he is serious about finding an acceptable alternative I don't understand why they haven't sat down with the various supporters groups (including the Trust) and tried to come up with an alternative that could have been supported by all of them. It can't have been that difficult. Option B with a few sensible tweaks would have had the support of large numbers of City fans.
You do understand why he hasn’t down with supporters groups really though don’t you...
I agree though
Option B
Leave North Stand for home fans
Include disabled supporters in concessions
Done deal
Depends on what you vote for , for some reason having concessions means we have to go back to having away fans in the North stand
BollocksWhat's wrong with that? Everyone kicked off like **** when we were moved from the east originally. A move back to the east and return of concessions would be a massive step forward.
Bollocks
If any of us want to move back there’s plenty of seats
Concessions - Yes
Deliberately ****ing fans about again, just for a laugh for Ehab - No
Bollocks
If any of us want to move back there’s plenty of seats
Concessions - Yes
Deliberately ****ing fans about again, just for a laugh for Ehab - No
The view from Upper West thoughIt's clearly your fault Dennis, you're the common denominator in all of this musical chairs lark. I reckon you kept quiet about your spell in upper west to try to throw us of the scent.
Is there something you want to come clean about?
Members Vote On Concessions
BY RUSSELL ANSON ON MAY 10, 2019HCST NEWS
The trust welcomes the opportunity for fans to have a vote on the return of ticket concessions or family bundles. However, there are questions and observations that we wish the club to respond to.
1 . We are very disappointed that lapsed members, the fans whom the Vice Chair indicates he wishes to build bridges with, are excluded from the voting process. This would be the equivalent of Tesco asking regular shoppers how to entice back shoppers who have taken their custom elsewhere. How can fans be asked to decide for others ?
2. Option B returns prices to the 2010/11 model. However, Disabled fans are excluded. Whilst the club are citing a, ‘level playing field’ as their arbitrary guidance some of our disabled members and fans are indicating vociferously they do not represent them. It cannot be the 2010/11 model if it does not include disabled fans as concessions. We would also wish for clarification on the age for Senior Citizen concessions.
3. Option B states that home fans in the North stand will be relocated. There is no explanation provided for this and it seems a divisive move. We therefore call upon the club to give the reasons behind this or remove it from the scenario.
4. Reference is made to the Upper West Stand. What will be the criteria for this to re-opened and will all maintenance work be carried out prior to re-opening.
5. Members of the founders 500 club, who are long standing supporters seated in w5 west stand had Senior Citizen concessions taken away and were made to pay corporate prices. Will the club be reverting to the situation as of 2010/11 in Option B
6. The Department of Digital Culture Media & Sport, DCMS have guidance rules on meaningful dialogue to football clubs. Clubs performance on this is monitored by The PL and EFL. Hull City partly meet these guidelines through their Supporters Committee.
HCST are not aware the latest poll on Concessions was discussed at the recent SC meeting. How can that be right?
7. We would like clarification on how the vote process will be transparent.
- How are votes collected?
- Who is monitoring the process to ensure impartiality?
- Will the votes be fully published?
- Will the club appoint an independent scrutiny officer?
ErmI thought Ehab had
You recently publicly stated that football administrators have now realised traditional pricing structures are wrong and so are interested in adopting your structure (or words to that effect). Why ballot now?