Off Topic The Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should the UK remain a part of the EU or leave?

  • Stay in

    Votes: 56 47.9%
  • Get out

    Votes: 61 52.1%

  • Total voters
    117
  • Poll closed .
The override is apparently only for the first few years
Then it will be taken away and you get to see the backs of caravans thereafter
Whatever the British agency that controls this has agreed to go along with the Eu already

This is the problem. It's system creep. It's an extension of smart motorways which are so saturated with cameras that a driver can't scratch his balls without having it recorded on a dozen videos
 
Under EU law, cars made from 2022 will have satellite controlled speed limiters on cars to enforce speed limits. Which is a good reason to buy your next car from Japan or America
Hopefully we'll be out and this draconian law won't apply here. It's the start of a superstate having an overseeing presence inside your car
Overtaking a tractor, parking on a single yellow to grab a newspaper, doing more than 70 mph on the motorway. EU Big Brother can **** off from my perspective.
Sorry, I got the wrong impression.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stroller
Sorry, I got the wrong impression.

It's the policy I dislike, and if the EU were to impose it on the UK against parliamentary will, then there would be an issue with the EU.

You've said you thought the UK Parliament would bring it in anyway. You may be right, in which case it ceases to be an EU issue (even though it appears to have originated there).

At the risk of sounding like Ellers, I think this policy is aimed at countries like France whose populace still drive around as if they're on a race track. The UK's road safety record is remarkably good because generally we exercise good judgement, consideration and restraint
 
You must log in or register to see images

Please never paste a copy of this rag on here again... it’s shameful and a sad reflection on what the sheep are fed ... thankfully the readership of this paper are on their way out

Head for the light Mutton

As for the Sun I have just been told by my phone that the U.K. is set for artic temperatures before enjoying 3 months heat wave

All these journalists and the TV presentation need major reform ... yes you don’t need to watch read or listen but these are the people that need to be accountable imo . It has ruined the U.K. culture and continue to do so
 
It's the policy I dislike, and if the EU were to impose it on the UK against parliamentary will, then there would be an issue with the EU.

You've said you thought the UK Parliament would bring it in anyway. You may be right, in which case it ceases to be an EU issue (even though it appears to have originated there).

At the risk of sounding like Ellers, I think this policy is aimed at countries like France whose populace still drive around as if they're on a race track. The UK's road safety record is remarkably good because generally we exercise good judgement, consideration and restraint

That is rubbish re French driving it has been a total revolution in the last five years
Drivers do not speed anymore so harsh is the penalties nowadays plus drivers don’t even cross solid white lines anymore . All villages throughout France have traffic calming coming watch and see

The culture of French driving has changed massively and within the next few years they would of completely changed the safety rating of the country... they already make and have invented the safest cars in the world and in two years or so will be the safest country to drive in the world. They already have the best roads it’s just a matter of time

Germany is a different story
 
That is rubbish re French driving it has been a total revolution in the last five years
Drivers do not speed anymore so harsh is the penalties nowadays plus drivers don’t even cross solid white lines anymore . All villages throughout France have traffic calming coming watch and see

The culture of French driving has changed massively and within the next few years they would of completely changed the safety rating of the country... they already make and have invented the safest cars in the world and in two years or so will be the safest country to drive in the world. They already have the best roads it’s just a matter of time

Germany is a different story

Well, sounds like France is moving in the right direction, which is good news DT. The stats show that France, Belgium, Iceland, Austria and Italy still have high road deaths. Worse than those are Greece, Poland, Portugal and Slovenia. Czech Republic is a death trap and as for Slovakia, if you drive to the shops, you have a 50/50 chance of making it back alive (slight exaggeration)
 
It's the policy I dislike, and if the EU were to impose it on the UK against parliamentary will, then there would be an issue with the EU.

You've said you thought the UK Parliament would bring it in anyway. You may be right, in which case it ceases to be an EU issue (even though it appears to have originated there).

At the risk of sounding like Ellers, I think this policy is aimed at countries like France whose populace still drive around as if they're on a race track. The UK's road safety record is remarkably good because generally we exercise good judgement, consideration and restraint
25,000 people a year die in road traffic accidents across Europe, 1700 of them in the UK (where we have another 25,000 serious injuries, and 140,000 other injuries). This policy is aimed at reducing those numbers. I assume it would also free up police time currently spent on manning speed traps and attending RTAs (though it might reduce police income through fines). As someone gradually reducing the number of points on my license by driving relatively sensibly for a few years, I would welcome the impossibility of getting any more and the removal of ugly speed cameras.

In my experience the quality of driving in the UK has deteriorated hugely. We are also the insurance fraud capital of Europe, with more than twice the level of whiplash claims than France, Spain or the Netherlands.

I would like to see some kind of evidence that the technology will actually reduce accidents though.

Having driven in Italy for a few years I suspect this policy won’t go down well, where driving is seen as some kind of mechanised bullfight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DT’s Socks
25,000 people a year die in road traffic accidents across Europe, 1700 of them in the UK (where we have another 25,000 serious injuries, and 140,000 other injuries). This policy is aimed at reducing those numbers. I assume it would also free up police time currently spent on manning speed traps and attending RTAs (though it might reduce police income through fines). As someone gradually reducing the number of points on my license by driving relatively sensibly for a few years, I would welcome the impossibility of getting any more and the removal of ugly speed cameras.

In my experience the quality of driving in the UK has deteriorated hugely. We are also the insurance fraud capital of Europe, with more than twice the level of whiplash claims than France, Spain or the Netherlands.

I would like to see some kind of evidence that the technology will actually reduce accidents though.

Having driven in Italy for a few years I suspect this policy won’t go down well, where driving is seen as some kind of mechanised bullfight.

Quite right about fraud in the road traffic system now and non payment of road tax etc Driving has become expensive and in low income areas, people have decided to take risk of no insurance or tax (or even, in some cases, driving licence).

I think having in car regulators is overkill from what I see. I very rarely see police manned speed traps. Most speed cameras I approve of. We have one at the bottom of the hill leading into our village. It ensures that cars don't gain momentum and whizz through the village at 50 mph. It has contributed to safety by reminding perfectly law abiding drivers to regulate speed.

Interesting point about Italy. The EU has to take people with it.
 
I travel a lot in Spain & France and there is a clear difference today

The old petition is slowing down at the moment I see but expect a another surge by tonight
Currently only 2 votes a second but could reach 10m by next week imo

https://splasho.com/petitions/index.php?petition=241584

The rate of signatures is clearly slowing down and a long way from being meaningful when compared with the referendum turnout, Paul. I'm guessing that the reason there's nothing similar of note for the Brexit voters is because they already cast their vote at the polling station.

Despite the noisy clamour for a second referendum and the marches in London, I still believe that the majority of British people are respectful of democracy and object to being bullied. It would not surprise me to see a second referendum actually deliver a higher majority in favour of Brexit. The issue isn't so much leaving the EU, but the manner by which we do so. If it had been handled more competently we'd be on our way.
 
Latest from Tusk

"Appeal to EP: You should be open to a long extension, if the UK wishes to rethink its strategy. 6 million people signed the petition, 1 million marched. They may not feel sufficiently represented by UK Parliament but they must feel represented by you. Because they are Europeans."

He just can't butt out of our business.

Tusk can say what he wants, good to have his support.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DT’s Socks
Tom Newton Dunn

One pro-deal Tory backbencher tells me he won't vote at all tonight, because none of the 16 options appeal to him. Says quite a few like him. A Tory mass abstention is the big flaw to the Letwin plan, as will mean any consensus is impossible to identify.
 
Tom Newton Dunn

One pro-deal Tory backbencher tells me he won't vote at all tonight, because none of the 16 options appeal to him. Says quite a few like him. A Tory mass abstention is the big flaw to the Letwin plan, as will mean any consensus is impossible to identify.

Would be very Brexity to just flounce off in a huff.
 
Tom Newton Dunn

One pro-deal Tory backbencher tells me he won't vote at all tonight, because none of the 16 options appeal to him. Says quite a few like him. A Tory mass abstention is the big flaw to the Letwin plan, as will mean any consensus is impossible to identify.

Utterly pathetic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QPR Oslo
Well, sounds like France is moving in the right direction, which is good news DT. The stats show that France, Belgium, Iceland, Austria and Italy still have high road deaths. Worse than those are Greece, Poland, Portugal and Slovenia. Czech Republic is a death trap and as for Slovakia, if you drive to the shops, you have a 50/50 chance of making it back alive (slight exaggeration)

Not that great I got done for speeding last year
€90 spot fine plus no card payment and if you haven’t got the cash then another €15 fine

the entire French systems are all online now
 
The rate of signatures is clearly slowing down and a long way from being meaningful when compared with the referendum turnout, Paul. I'm guessing that the reason there's nothing similar of note for the Brexit voters is because they already cast their vote at the polling station.

Despite the noisy clamour for a second referendum and the marches in London, I still believe that the majority of British people are respectful of democracy and object to being bullied. It would not surprise me to see a second referendum actually deliver a higher majority in favour of Brexit. The issue isn't so much leaving the EU, but the manner by which we do so. If it had been handled more competently we'd be on our way.

Agree totally I am not putting any faith into any petition it’s just very interesting to watch the flow rate . I respected the vote and no problem leaving the EU for myself ... if there is a second vote which because the importance then that gets my equal respect either way

I believe however if there is a second vote we will see a 60/40 result to remain purely based on the acceptance of facts and the journey we have all been on in three years . I do not believe that the 16m remain vote will decrease in anyway I cannot see that ... I can only see that figure or percentage increase base wise. Hence I believe if it happens it will be a very large swing to revoke and remain

I base my opinion on any leave campaign to be difficult to convince the electorate that there is a post Brexit plan or vision

Scotland and NI figures will be larger and most uK cities also

The no deal thing on both sides is dead as dead and the EU will win that game of poker anyway such is the weak governance of the U.K.

Either way the divide will still be there and any idiot today who seriously thinks a no deal will be fine at last is looked upon as a minority... that’s how far we have become ... look at the petition for that as a current indicator even if it’s just a petition

You would expect a similar surge for no deal now but it’s not happening on the same platform an anyone see that ?
 
The rate of signatures is clearly slowing down and a long way from being meaningful when compared with the referendum turnout, Paul. I'm guessing that the reason there's nothing similar of note for the Brexit voters is because they already cast their vote at the polling station.

Despite the noisy clamour for a second referendum and the marches in London, I still believe that the majority of British people are respectful of democracy and object to being bullied. It would not surprise me to see a second referendum actually deliver a higher majority in favour of Brexit. The issue isn't so much leaving the EU, but the manner by which we do so. If it had been handled more competently we'd be on our way.

Great post, Uber
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uber_Hoop
The balance between rights and responsibilities is, as you say, critical. But do we really want to be forced to have gear in the car that reports to government each time we creep over 70mph on a motorway and a computer sends us a summons for 3 points and a fine?
We're there already. If you haven't been caught yet you will be soon unless you are lucky enough not to have a smart motorway near you. I got done almost 3 years ago on an empty M1 travelling South near Nottingham at 62 mph keeping pace and a very healthy distance behind the vehicle in front in the middle lane. no danger to anybody as we were all behaving ourselves in a responsible way including a GP who now lives in my village. She was doing 61. The reason being that the variable speed limit was 60 at that time. They must have been coining it at the time.