leave her there

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

What should we do with her

  • Let the slag rot where she is?

    Votes: 25 62.5%

  • Bring her back home and lock her up

    Votes: 6 15.0%

  • Bring her back and interrogate her for info for her freedom

    Votes: 2 5.0%

  • Bring her back and give love and understanding

    Votes: 4 10.0%

  • Just give the bitch and her spawn everything she wants for free

    Votes: 2 5.0%

  • Give her the bullet

    Votes: 7 17.5%
  • Total voters
    40
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Commachio said:
will any club take him?

i very much doubt it/
Click to expand...

I would imagine there'll be restrictions on him anyway, at least until his sentence is fully served. If he's released from prison, he's still technically serving his sentence for the next three years.
 
brb said:
Al Qaeda came about in 2004. Saddam Hussein was toppled in 2003. Don't get me wrong Saddam was brutal, and was responsible for thousands of deaths, however, Blair and Bush were responsible for even more deaths than Saddam by removing him from power in Iraq. Firstly due to the conflict and secondly due to the consequences. It's reckoned that 460,000 people died due to the Blair and Bush intervention. It is said that as a consequence AQI was formed by the minority Sunni's who believed they were being persecuted by the Shiite's, despite holding dominance under Hussein. However, two years after the forming of AQI, the US involvement once again, took out their leader Zarqawi. This death resulted in a new leader who created what is now known as IS the Islamic State. But things were to get worse, much worse...due to the Americans once again, who were just not learning from the fooking mess they had already created, I could add a narrative that they really wanted to unstable the area, well they succeeded! This time the US killed Masri, opening the door to Baghdadi, this resulted in Civil War in Syria. So yes, I believe due to the unstabling of the area by US and UK forces, this resulted in the creation of the terror groups we have today and maybe go some to explain why it upset so many muslims in Britain and many other countries, that they felt the necessity to go and fight.

If you was referring to the 357% media attention, then yes, that is fact, referring to American soil only.
Click to expand...

Al Qaeda wasn’t formed in 2004 mate.

I’m well aware of the events of 2003 as well, considering I was directly involved in the inception of Op Telic.
 
Tel said:
Al Qaeda wasn’t formed in 2004 mate.

I’m well aware of the events of 2003 as well, considering I was directly involved in the inception of Op Telic.
Click to expand...

I said AQI...I should have put it in brackets at the beginning of the sentence. You will see in the comment i referred to it correctly twice afterwards <ok>
 
Commachio said:
getting out this month.
Click to expand...

Something i always argued is that footballers should be subject to enhanced criminal checks, which i don't think they currently are. Reason i say that is because clubs seem to readily and easily employ ex-criminals. Whereas in other employments, where you go into hospitals, care homes, and are around children you would be required to have an enhanced check done. I get you have served your time and all that stuff but clubs are supposed to be about being in the community, surely that wording alone and the clubs involvement with the sick and vulnerable, the latter being a 15 year old girl, should make an enhanced check mandatory. I know it probably wouldn't have protected that girl, but it would prevent any further chance of re-offending due to his employment possibilities as they currently stand.
 
Given the ages, no doubt Fawaz Gerges would draw similar conclusions to Johnson's character as he did for Yago Riedijk.
 
brb said:
i haven't been found out about anything, you are just an irritating little twat, who happens to be a racist <ok>
Click to expand...

You didn't realise the Prof's work is not unknown to some of us. Missing his name off and not posting a link was a massive clue that you were twisting his words. :emoticon-0102-bigsm

Others have tried the racist thing. It's just a feeble way of trying to shut someone up. Nobody's managed to back up the claim, but they still try to hide behind it.
 
DMD said:
You didn't realise the Prof's not unknown to some of us. Missing his name off and not posting a link was a massive clue that you were twisting his words.

Others have tried the racist thing. It's just a feeble way of trying to shut someone up. Nobody's managed to back up the claim, but they still try to hide behind it.
Click to expand...

I wasn't twisting anything you prick, i looked him up the same as you did, I knew if i gave you enough clues you would look him up too, because it's what you do <doh>

You have a problem with me because i defended a Muslim, nothing more, nothing less. See unlike you, i will defend anyone when i believe they are being treated unfairly in real life. Being a Muslim or of a particular colour of skin, don't come into it for me, i based it on the legalities of the situation ie she has not been convicted of a terrorist act. As the professor stated, she was 15. Now you might think it is ok for a Dutchman to marry and have sex with a 15 year old, well i fooking don't. Yes, it is four years on, but those crimes or if you like, moral crimes happened to her. However, for the last few days you have twisted everything i have said for your own racist means, so now fook of kunt <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stan
brb said:
I wasn't twisting anything you prick, i looked him up the same as you did, I knew if i gave you enough clues you would look him up too, because it's what you do <doh>

You have a problem with me because i defended a Muslim, nothing more, nothing less. See unlike you, i will defend anyone when i believe they are being treated unfairly in real life. Being a Muslim or of a particular colour of skin, don't come into it for me, i based it on the legalities of the situation ie she has not been convicted of a terrorist act. As the professor stated, she was 15. Now you might think it is ok for a Dutchman to marry and have sex with a 15 year old, well i fooking don't. Yes, it is four years on, but those crimes or if you like, moral crimes happened to her. However, for the last few days you have twisted everything i have said for your own racist means, so now fook of kunt <ok>
Click to expand...

What a load of clueless piffle. :emoticon-0102-bigsm

It's just small minded and lazy to assume not wanting terrorists to get off lightly is somehow racist, and your fantasy version actually says far more about you, than me. <doh>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back