leave her there

This would make an more interesting debate

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...on-seven-bedroom-mansion-released-prison.html

 

He's not a *****phile, they're in to prepubescents. He's more a hebephile.

 

will any club take him?

i very much doubt it/

 

He's still to get out in one piece yet, so i'm sure that story is not going to help him inside. He's already had to be moved, according to that article.

 

I would imagine there'll be restrictions on him anyway, at least until his sentence is fully served. If he's released from prison, he's still technically serving his sentence for the next three years.

 

Hopefully not, but someone probably will.

 

getting out this month.

 

Al Qaeda wasn’t formed in 2004 mate.

I’m well aware of the events of 2003 as well, considering I was directly involved in the inception of Op Telic.

 

I said AQI...I should have put it in brackets at the beginning of the sentence. You will see in the comment i referred to it correctly twice afterwards

 

No chance.

 

Something i always argued is that footballers should be subject to enhanced criminal checks, which i don't think they currently are. Reason i say that is because clubs seem to readily and easily employ ex-criminals. Whereas in other employments, where you go into hospitals, care homes, and are around children you would be required to have an enhanced check done. I get you have served your time and all that stuff but clubs are supposed to be about being in the community, surely that wording alone and the clubs involvement with the sick and vulnerable, the latter being a 15 year old girl, should make an enhanced check mandatory. I know it probably wouldn't have protected that girl, but it would prevent any further chance of re-offending due to his employment possibilities as they currently stand.

 

Given the ages, no doubt Fawaz Gerges would draw similar conclusions to Johnson's character as he did for Yago Riedijk.

 

Fook of you racist little twat

 

You do get touchy when you get found out.

 

i haven't been found out about anything, you are just an irritating little twat, who happens to be a racist

 

You didn't realise the Prof's work is not unknown to some of us. Missing his name off and not posting a link was a massive clue that you were twisting his words.

Others have tried the racist thing. It's just a feeble way of trying to shut someone up. Nobody's managed to back up the claim, but they still try to hide behind it.

 

I wasn't twisting anything you prick, i looked him up the same as you did, I knew if i gave you enough clues you would look him up too, because it's what you do

You have a problem with me because i defended a Muslim, nothing more, nothing less. See unlike you, i will defend anyone when i believe they are being treated unfairly in real life. Being a Muslim or of a particular colour of skin, don't come into it for me, i based it on the legalities of the situation ie she has not been convicted of a terrorist act. As the professor stated, she was 15. Now you might think it is ok for a Dutchman to marry and have sex with a 15 year old, well i fooking don't. Yes, it is four years on, but those crimes or if you like, moral crimes happened to her. However, for the last few days you have twisted everything i have said for your own racist means, so now fook of kunt

 

What a load of clueless piffle.

It's just small minded and lazy to assume not wanting terrorists to get off lightly is somehow racist, and your fantasy version actually says far more about you, than me.

 

this should be interesting.