Just the start

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
this is only rumour, but from a good source, that Jenkins knows he ****ed up selling the club to the yanks and has tried with others twice in the last 6 months to buy the club back. only rumour.
Jenkins never sold the club ,,,He dont have that power, The Morgans sold the club not Jenkins..<laugh>
 
Why are some of you acting dumb <laugh> Jenkins was just a figurehead for the Americans and was well paid for it....With the Morgans or the Morgan family like dick head liks to call them then he was a proper chairman but he still could not do anything of his own back without consulting the owners......What part of that dont you understand.......You need to get up very early in the morning to know a fraction about how the swans are run....you dont have a clue however much you try to reply to the FACTS.......Oh and i run two businesses very successful i'm proud to say allowing me a generous income for me and my family and 11 staff......Wake up and learn from someone that knows a thing or two....
 
You don't seem to understand the basic principle of how a Company operates .He and 5 others sold a percentage of their shares and you reckon you're a successful business man <laugh>
You saying that the driving force/brains behind the transaction was Morgan? If so, you are incorrect! By the way, neither was it the Morgan family....
Guys, I wonder why you gave that prick your time to reply, he is clearly on day release from Cefn Coed and that is how he has internet access. not worth the steam off my piss that's why I didn't answer the prick.
 
I must admit I feel for you lot. He's like John Hughs used to be.....but sometimes h talks sense....I reckon his grandkids get on his computer. On this one, I reckon he is mixing up the shareholding of the Trust by each individual member, where he is correct that there'll be no return and the shareholding in the club OF the trust. The trust has some say in how the club is run albeit as a minority holding.....unless their shares have no voting rights. But I have seen nothing to the latter. Taff will surely know.
One last thing: not knowing something is fine but to call others stupid and slag off from such a position is truly cretinous.
(Employing 11 staff and not being incorporated doesn't hugely look like good business practice either. Usually, it's only accountants and lawyers that pull that one.)
 
I must admit I feel for you lot. He's like John Hughs used to be.....but sometimes h talks sense....I reckon his grandkids get on his computer. On this one, I reckon he is mixing up the shareholding of the Trust by each individual member, where he is correct that there'll be no return and the shareholding in the club OF the trust. The trust has some say in how the club is run albeit as a minority holding.....unless their shares have no voting rights. But I have seen nothing to the latter. Taff will surely know.
One last thing: not knowing something is fine but to call others stupid and slag off from such a position is truly cretinous.
(Employing 11 staff and not being incorporated doesn't hugely look like good business practice either. Usually, it's only accountants and lawyers that pull that one.)
The Trust’s shares still have their voting rights!

Accountants & Lawyers now have Limited Liability Partnerships - so they’ve ‘wised-up’ as well!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DragonPhilljack
I must admit I feel for you lot. He's like John Hughs used to be.....but sometimes h talks sense....I reckon his grandkids get on his computer. On this one, I reckon he is mixing up the shareholding of the Trust by each individual member, where he is correct that there'll be no return and the shareholding in the club OF the trust. The trust has some say in how the club is run albeit as a minority holding.....unless their shares have no voting rights. But I have seen nothing to the latter. Taff will surely know.
One last thing: not knowing something is fine but to call others stupid and slag off from such a position is truly cretinous.
(Employing 11 staff and not being incorporated doesn't hugely look like good business practice either. Usually, it's only accountants and lawyers that pull that one.)
John Hughs, that takes me back. Does he still post? He was funny!! :)
 
Only person that I know can get from Cardiff to the mumbles in 45mins after a game finished!!
Or have special dispensation from a brewery to break into one of their long closed down pubs in Mumbles , put on bar staff and a barrel specially for him and his students mates.:emoticon-0140-rofl: I think he liked the Mumbles so we did have something in common <yikes>
 
https://tinyurl.com/y7256dgg

We`ll wait and see ....................................................



said the blind man to the other blind man, with all the other blind men standing behind them.



Waiting to be led down a blind alley.










The knives are out and the yanks are putting up their deflection shields, imo all bullshit regarding going forward, if they were that upset with Jenkins then why allow him to carry on like a kid in sweetshop when it came to player purchases.Coincidence that a vote on whether the Trust should take the lot of them to court could be just at the end of this month and now they want to be friends.hmmm