So who out of chelsea, mancity, manu and liverpool have spent most but more importantly improved their squads. Chelsea has spent 150mil if you include the 13 mil for avb. In my opinion they don't seem that better off then they were in early Jan, infect they have dropped a notch. Mireles is still confusing to me as hes not a play maker so dont know where he'll play for chelsea. Liverpool are the second big spenders with 110mil. Many of my fellow reds will quickly tell you that we only have a net spend of 37 mil. Looking at the pool squad i'll say it's improved drastically with practically every player key to pools success. So good job done by kenny. Man city are third with about 107mil spent. They got 2 world class players in nasri and aguero as we've all seen theyve already made their mark. Hargreaves will also prove to be an astute signing in my opinion so all in all I think they did very well in the transfer market and are setup to challenge Manu. Manu are fourth with about 50mil. Young and jones don't need any introduction and have fitted in very well in an already performing side. Sir Alex just tweaked here and there and in my opinion did very well in this window. The league is theirs to lose to man city. So all in all I'd say chelsea is the only team that didn't improve their squad having spent more money. Interested to hear what everyone else thinks?

You don't have a clue.