Match Day Thread General matchday thread.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Why do you always fall back on that when you get called out on your bullshit? It's embarrassing.
You reply without hitting the reply and claim rattled.
"When all else fails, and you have been exposed as a ****, post a net, or better yet claim your opponent is rattled"

Doing a good job of refuting that rattled claim <laugh>
 
To be fair, some of the Spurs fans on here have tried to pull the same **** with Henry Norris investing in Arsenal after most of their players were killed in world war I.

I don't hold it against them, I just like pointing out the hypocrisy of the whiney united fans. As to Tottenham, they are correct, you bought your way into the top league in a very dubious fashion, so you can't really complain about chelsea or Man City, it's just sour grapes, leave that to the red side of Manchester.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PleaseNotPoll
Was just pointing out how bitter you Spuds are about Henry Norris, even 100 years later. You've proved my point perfectly <ok>
No, that's not what you tried to claim. As usual you say one thing, get called on it and then try to claim you said something else.
Now you can say rattled again, if you'd like.
 
No, that's not what you tried to claim. As usual you say one thing, get called on it and then try to claim you said something else.
Now you can say rattled again, if you'd like.

I'm sure in your head, your own argument makes sense <ok>
 
No, by proving my point that you lot still prattle on about it 100 years later and have compared it to the same investment that was made into City and Chelsea.

Same point that @Chief was making about the investment into Utd after the first world war.
the first world war had been long finished when Man Utd were pumped full of cash in the mid 30's, it was about their debt, dwindling crowds, no success etc, not to dssimilar to Chelsea pre-Roman
 
the first world war had been long finished when Man Utd were pumped full of cash in the mid 30's, it was about their debt, dwindling crowds, no success etc, not to dssimilar to Chelsea pre-Roman

All clubs have had some investment at some point during their histories though. I just don't think anything has compared to the effect on the league that both Chelsea and City being pumped full of cash did though.

It's a bit difficult to draw comparisons though I suppose, as times have changed so much. But Chelsea were worth £1 and on the brink of going bust before Roman turned up and City were just another yo-yo club.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archers Road